2023
DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofad140
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Utility of a Viral Vesicular Panel Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay for the Diagnosis of Monkeypox, Herpes Simplex, and Varicella Zoster Viruses

Abstract: Mpox represents a diagnostic challenge due to varied clinical presentations and multiple mimics. A commercially available multiplex PCR panel accurately detects mpox virus as well as common mimics (HSV, VZV) in clinical specimens and could be used in routine clinical, surveillance, and outbreak settings.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To our knowledge, this is the third published study to report results on the QIAstat-Dx assay. In the study by Wilber et al [10], QIAstat-Dx allowed researchers to detect MPXV clade II in 36 of 47 samples, whereas the comparator (Mpox Virus DNA Qualitative Real-Time PCR assay; Quest Diagnostics, Chantilly, VA, USA) detected MPXV clade II in 37 of 47 samples, thus resulting in a positive agreement of 97.3% (36/37 samples). The sample with a discordant result had a Ct value with the Quest Diagnostics assay near the limit of detection, suggesting a sample's viral load below the limit of detection of the QIAstat-Dx assay.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To our knowledge, this is the third published study to report results on the QIAstat-Dx assay. In the study by Wilber et al [10], QIAstat-Dx allowed researchers to detect MPXV clade II in 36 of 47 samples, whereas the comparator (Mpox Virus DNA Qualitative Real-Time PCR assay; Quest Diagnostics, Chantilly, VA, USA) detected MPXV clade II in 37 of 47 samples, thus resulting in a positive agreement of 97.3% (36/37 samples). The sample with a discordant result had a Ct value with the Quest Diagnostics assay near the limit of detection, suggesting a sample's viral load below the limit of detection of the QIAstat-Dx assay.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diagnosis of mpox based on clinical presentation alone may be difficult, especially in atypical presentation cases [6]. Therefore, it is important not only to differentiate the two MPXV clades from each other, but also MPXV from other orthopoxviruses (MPXV is a double-stranded DNA virus belonging to the genus Orthopoxvirus [OPX]) [7][8][9] or other vesicular disease-causing viruses such as herpes simplex virus 1 and 2 (HSV-1/HSV-2), human herpesvirus 6 (HHV6), enterovirus (EV), or varicella zoster virus (VZV) [10,11]. The speed of diagnosis, achievable through a point-of-care testing (POCT) molecular assay, may be important, especially if the surge in mpox cases requires easier detection and timely control at the local level to decrease the global spread of the disease [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A multiplex approach for MPXV, VARV, and the varicella-zoster virus (VZV) identification was reported, employing [36] the unique sequences F3L, B12R, and ORF38, respectively, reducing the probability of misidentification of coexisting pathogens [37,38]. For infectious syndromes such as meningitis/encephalitis, pneumonia, and Mpox, standard multiplex pathogen panels implying RT-PCR have emerged as useful clinical tools, given the high probability of clinical overlap and coinfections with other similar viruses [39].…”
Section: Development Of Various Diagnostic Techniques (A) Development...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the anal swabs were analysed for the presence of MPXV using reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using the Qiagen QIAstat-Dx (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) analyzer and the Qiagen QIAstat-Dx Viral Vesicular Panel. The qualitative multiplex PCR panel can detect MPXV (clade 1 and 2), human herpesvirus (HHV)-1, HHV-2, HHV-3, HHV-6, and human enterovirus [13]. The analyses within this study were approved by the local ethics committee (EC 1051/2020 and EC 898/2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%