2009
DOI: 10.1080/15326340903088495
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Utility Maximization Under Bounded Expected Loss

Abstract: We consider the optimal selection of portfolios for utility maximizing investors under joint budget and shortfall risk constraints. The shortfall risk is measured in terms of the expected loss. Depending on the parameters of the risk constraint we show existence of an optimal solution and uniqueness of the corresponding Lagrange multipliers. Using Malliavin calculus we also provide the optimal trading strategy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(50 reference statements)
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The existence of λ * ≥ 0, such that E[L(−H λ * (ydQ/dP ))] = x 1 was proven in Lemma 3.9. Furthermore, by (14) we have…”
Section: Main Theoremmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The existence of λ * ≥ 0, such that E[L(−H λ * (ydQ/dP ))] = x 1 was proven in Lemma 3.9. Furthermore, by (14) we have…”
Section: Main Theoremmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Such problems are examined in [10], where the shortfall risk is measured in terms of the expected loss and applied in a static manner.…”
Section: The Normal Distribution and The Inverse Distribution Functiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This encouraged researchers to consider a risk measure that is based on the risk neutral expectation of loss -the Limited Expected Loss (LEL). The work of [4] is extended by Gabih, Sass and Wunderlich [10] to cover the case of bounded Expected Loss.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Observe that ρ is not cash-invariant and thus not a risk measure in the sense of Definition 1.1. But their risk constraint can be reformulated in terms of a utility-based shortfall risk measure which can be interpreted as a limiting case of GUNDEL and WEBER [2008], see GABIH, SASS and WUNDERLICH [2007].…”
Section: Static Risk Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%