2014
DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2014.08.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Utility and Validity of Estimated GFR–Based Surrogate Time-to-Event End Points in CKD: A Simulation Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
73
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
73
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The faster the decrease in the percentage changes in eGFR, the greater was the risk of ESRD, but the fewer was the number of such subjects. In a sample size estimation simulation study, comparison of the sample sizes with percentage changes in eGFR of 30 or 40% as the surrogate endpoint and with 57% as the surrogate endpoint showed the sample size of 30 or 40% to be smaller than the samples size of 57% by more than 20% [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The faster the decrease in the percentage changes in eGFR, the greater was the risk of ESRD, but the fewer was the number of such subjects. In a sample size estimation simulation study, comparison of the sample sizes with percentage changes in eGFR of 30 or 40% as the surrogate endpoint and with 57% as the surrogate endpoint showed the sample size of 30 or 40% to be smaller than the samples size of 57% by more than 20% [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Although the use of endpoints based on the 30 or 40% decrease in eGFR is an appropriate strategy for reducing sample size in specific circumstances, the risks of type 1 error increase when there are acute effects, especially when eGFR decreases by 30%. It was concluded that use of these endpoints must be decided after evaluating the anticipated effects (decrease in sample size, improvement of statistically detection ability) under specific clinical study conditions [11].…”
Section: Interventional Studies Investigations Comparing the Effects mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…11,12,[14][15][16][17][18] To approve a drug, the FDA requires that a development program show that a drug has an effect on a clinically meaningful end point or its reliable surrogate. 19 ESRD is a widely accepted, clinically meaningful end point; however, ESRD is simply too late an event for the majority of clinical trial participants-a rationale that applies to both clinical trials of AKI prevention and treatment and CKD progression.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%