1968
DOI: 10.2307/1237541
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Utility Analysis in a Practical Setting

Abstract: An empirical study involving derivations of farmers' utility functions and the accuracy of these functions in predicting practical decisions is here reported. Three models of utility estimation which were used are compared as to their predictive accuracy and usefulness under field conditions. The study tests the hypothesis that maximizing expected utility, as a criterion of decision, is superior to maximizing expected monetary value. Utility functions are derived for two points in time in order to test the hyp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
43
0
1

Year Published

1989
1989
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(14 reference statements)
3
43
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding confirmed the results from some previous studies (Officer and Halter 1968;Lin et al 1974;Conklin et al 1977;Moscardi and Janvry 1977;Brink and McCarl 1978;Dillon and Scandizzo 1978;Binswanger 1980;Binswanger 1981;Elamin and Rogers 1992;Ceyhan et al 1997;Akçaöz and Akdemir 2001;Karahan 2002).…”
Section: Risk Attitudes Of Organic and Conventional Hazelnut Producerssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This finding confirmed the results from some previous studies (Officer and Halter 1968;Lin et al 1974;Conklin et al 1977;Moscardi and Janvry 1977;Brink and McCarl 1978;Dillon and Scandizzo 1978;Binswanger 1980;Binswanger 1981;Elamin and Rogers 1992;Ceyhan et al 1997;Akçaöz and Akdemir 2001;Karahan 2002).…”
Section: Risk Attitudes Of Organic and Conventional Hazelnut Producerssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Existing theory and empirical analysis from agricultural economics and land change science suggest that current patterns of land use are the aggregate outcome of individual farmers acting to maximize their utility, given the assets they are endowed with (Officer andHalter 1968, Walker 2004). These studies typically focus on a narrow set of assets, including land, labor, and manufactured capital, concluding that the relative abundance of these key assets within a particular region plays a pivotal role in determining regional (and intra-household) land use choices.…”
Section: Background and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experiments and hypothetical alternatives are usually used to determine risk aversion using this method. This approach was used by Offi cer and Halter (1968), Lin et al (1974), Webster and Kennedy (1975), Dillon and Scandizzo (1978), Halter and Mason (1978), Young (1979) and Collins et al (1991). The second approach stands on a position that risk aversion is a latent feature and can be observed only indirectly (for example through observing farmers' investment activities).…”
Section: Risk Perception and Risk Aversion Among Farmersmentioning
confidence: 99%