2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.annder.2020.09.338
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Utilisation du groupe placebo dans les essais contrôlés randomisés sur le psoriasis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…10 In addition, clinical trials-mainly placebo-controlled for 12 to 16 weeks-are insufficient to assess the relative long-term efficacy of biologics and are often incomplete regarding safety. 11 Treatment persistence, defined as the time from initiation to discontinuation, is an important real-world outcome for assessing the total value of a drug and is a relevant indicator of a patient's level of interest. 12,13 This criterion can be considered a composite of efficacy (a treatment perceived as ineffective is likely to be discontinued) and safety (a poorly tolerated treatment is likely to be discontinued) but also of patient satisfaction or preference and adherence.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 In addition, clinical trials-mainly placebo-controlled for 12 to 16 weeks-are insufficient to assess the relative long-term efficacy of biologics and are often incomplete regarding safety. 11 Treatment persistence, defined as the time from initiation to discontinuation, is an important real-world outcome for assessing the total value of a drug and is a relevant indicator of a patient's level of interest. 12,13 This criterion can be considered a composite of efficacy (a treatment perceived as ineffective is likely to be discontinued) and safety (a poorly tolerated treatment is likely to be discontinued) but also of patient satisfaction or preference and adherence.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 With the fast emergence of these new therapeutic agents, evaluating long-term comparative safety in a real-world setting is needed because patients with moderate to severe psoriasis may be at increased risk of serious infection, depending on the biologic agent used. 3 Clinical trials are not adequately powered to assess the risk of serious infection, defined as any infection leading to hospitalization in patients with psoriasis receiving biologic therapies, 4,5 and have limited external validity because 30% to 80% of patients with psoriasis receiving biologics in national cohorts are not eligible to participate in randomized clinical trials. Moreover, ineligible patients are more likely to have serious adverse events, including serious infections, than are eligible patients.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%