2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2010.04.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Utilisation de la nifédipine et de la nicardipine dans le traitement de la menace d’accouchement prématurée : données observationnelles en population

Abstract: Nicardipine is the first choice for French obstetricians in management of severe threatened preterm delivery. However, intravenous nicardipine does not increase gestational duration in comparison with oral nifedipine.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nifedipine is equally efficacious when compared to atosiban, though the lower cost of nifedipine and the impact on reducing neonatal morbidity often makes it the preferred drug of choice [67]. Other CCBs, such as nicardipine, can be administered intravenously or orally; this flexible route of administration is a benefit over nifedipine, which is only orally or sublingually administered [85]. However, nicardipine may have reduced efficacy in prolonging the duration of pregnancy and may produce more side effects in neonates [67,85].…”
Section: Calcium Channel Blockers (Ccbs): Low Cost and Favorable Safety Profilementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nifedipine is equally efficacious when compared to atosiban, though the lower cost of nifedipine and the impact on reducing neonatal morbidity often makes it the preferred drug of choice [67]. Other CCBs, such as nicardipine, can be administered intravenously or orally; this flexible route of administration is a benefit over nifedipine, which is only orally or sublingually administered [85]. However, nicardipine may have reduced efficacy in prolonging the duration of pregnancy and may produce more side effects in neonates [67,85].…”
Section: Calcium Channel Blockers (Ccbs): Low Cost and Favorable Safety Profilementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other CCBs, such as nicardipine, can be administered intravenously or orally; this flexible route of administration is a benefit over nifedipine, which is only orally or sublingually administered [85]. However, nicardipine may have reduced efficacy in prolonging the duration of pregnancy and may produce more side effects in neonates [67,85]. Though nifedipine is not FDA-approved for tocolysis, numerous meta-analyses have shown that CCBs may sometimes effectively delay PTB by up to 7 days, a significant increase in the extent of PTB delay when compared with the 24 h or 48 h delay conferred by most other therapeutics [59,86].…”
Section: Calcium Channel Blockers (Ccbs): Low Cost and Favorable Safety Profilementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, intravenous nicardipine does not increase the duration of pregnancy in comparison with oral nifedipine. The median duration between treatment for PTB and delivery was significantly longer when nifedipine was used [44]. Oral nicardipine is additionally an effective and well-tolerated tocolytic agent.…”
Section: The Efficacy Of Ccbs Against Ptbmentioning
confidence: 99%