2020
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.0c02461
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Utica Shale Play Oil and Gas Brines: Geochemistry and Factors Influencing Wastewater Management

Abstract: The Utica and Marcellus Shale Plays in the Appalachian Basin are the fourth and first largest natural gas producing plays in the United States, respectively. Hydrocarbon production generates large volumes of brine (“produced water”) that must be disposed of, treated, or reused. Though Marcellus brines have been studied extensively, there are few studies from the Utica Shale Play. This study presents new brine chemical analyses from 16 Utica Shale Play wells in Ohio and Pennsylvania. Results from Na–Cl–Br syste… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Barnett shale produces both oil as well as dry gas while the Marcellus is primarily a dry gas play. The Utica shale is considered the major source rock in the Appalachian basin 35 and produces both oil and dry gas.…”
Section: Materials All Shale Samples Were Donated By Associate Profementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Barnett shale produces both oil as well as dry gas while the Marcellus is primarily a dry gas play. The Utica shale is considered the major source rock in the Appalachian basin 35 and produces both oil and dry gas.…”
Section: Materials All Shale Samples Were Donated By Associate Profementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to developing training sets with data in the USGS PWGD, we also used recently published data (Blondes et al, 2020;Engle, 2019;Engle et al, 2020) that is not currently included in the USGS PWGD as additional testing data for the models. The data are produced waters from the Eagle Ford (n = 39; Engle, 2019;Engle et al, 2020) and the Appalachian Basin, specifically the Utica Shale and Clinton sandstone (n = 52; Blondes et al, 2020).…”
Section: Development and Testing Of ''Unknown'' Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to developing training sets with data in the USGS PWGD, we also used recently published data (Blondes et al, 2020;Engle, 2019;Engle et al, 2020) that is not currently included in the USGS PWGD as additional testing data for the models. The data are produced waters from the Eagle Ford (n = 39; Engle, 2019;Engle et al, 2020) and the Appalachian Basin, specifically the Utica Shale and Clinton sandstone (n = 52; Blondes et al, 2020). Because the data used in the validation sets may have originated from the same sampling campaigns as those data used in the training sets, i.e., both were from the same database, this may introduce bias into the TestPWGD7 and TestPWGD9 results.…”
Section: Development and Testing Of ''Unknown'' Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations