2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.04.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uterus retrieval process from brain dead donors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
43
0
6

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
43
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…They concluded that uterus retrieval with its vasculature and supporting sacro-uterine, vesico-uterine peritoneal folds is an anatomically feasible procedure in preparation for uterus transplantation. Gauthier et al described the feasibility of human uterus retrieval after donation after brain death [10]. A specific organ retrieval procedure was performed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They concluded that uterus retrieval with its vasculature and supporting sacro-uterine, vesico-uterine peritoneal folds is an anatomically feasible procedure in preparation for uterus transplantation. Gauthier et al described the feasibility of human uterus retrieval after donation after brain death [10]. A specific organ retrieval procedure was performed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apoptosis was rare. The paper concluded that uterine retrieval could be part of a reproducible multiorgan procurement procedure and seems readily acceptable to the families of the deceased donor [10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Main advantage of deceased donation is avoidance of any risk to the donor and relative technical simplicity because larger vessels can be used for anastomoses. 2 The uterine graft is recovered as part of the multiorgan recovery and is subject to the limitations of organ availability. There has been one successful uterine transplant from a deceased donor.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En effet, est-il é thique, en raison des risques chirurgicaux potentiels, de pré lever chez une patiente vivante un uté rus alors que celui-ci est un organe non vital et que le succè s de la TU est incertain ? La reproductibilité et la qualité vasculaire du pré lè vement uté rin au sein d'un pré lè vement multi-organe [13] sont autant d'é lé ments remettant en cause un tel choix. De plus, l'âge des donneuses supé rieur à 50 ans peut à lui seul compromettre les ré sultats de l'é tude sué doise, la qualité vasculaire de l'uté rus s'alté rant avec l'âge.…”
unclassified
“…De plus, l'âge des donneuses supé rieur à 50 ans peut à lui seul compromettre les ré sultats de l'é tude sué doise, la qualité vasculaire de l'uté rus s'alté rant avec l'âge. Nous avons pu confirmer que l'endarté rite fibreuse, responsable d'une ré duction partielle ou totale de la lumiè re arté rielle, augmentait avec l'âge et é tait importante au-delà de 50 ans [13]. Un dé bit arté riel diminué et une augmentation des ré sistances vasculaires pourraient augmenter les risques d'é chec de la TU, de fausses couches, de retard de croissance uté rin et de pré é clampsie.…”
unclassified