Uterine slow wave: directionality and changes with imminent delivery

Abstract

Objective. The slow wave (SW) of the electrohysterogram (EHG) may contain relevant information on the electrophysiological condition of the uterus throughout pregnancy and labor. Our aim was to assess differences in the SW as regards the imminence of labor and the directionality of uterine myoelectrical activity. Approach. The SW of the EHG was extracted from the signals of the Icelandic 16-electrode EHG database in the bandwidth [5, 30] mHz and its power, spectral content, complexity and synchronization between the horizontal (X) and vertical (Y) directions were characterized by the root mean square (RMS), dominant frequency (domF), sample entropy (SampEn) and maximum cross-correlation (CCmax) of the signals, respectively. Significant differences between parameters at time-to-delivery (TTD) ≤7 vs. >7 days and between the horizontal vs. vertical directions were assessed. Main results. The SW power significantly increased in both directions as labor approached (TTD≤7d vs. >7d (mean±SD): x= 0.12±0.10 vs. 0.08±0.06mV; y= 0.12±0.09 vs. 0.08±0.05mV), as well as the dominant frequency in the horizontal direction (= 9.1±1.3 vs. 8.5±1.2mHz) and the synchronization between both directions (= 0.44±0.16 vs. 0.36±0.14). Furthermore, its complexity decreased in the vertical direction (= 6.13·10−2±8.7·10−3 vs. 6.50·10−2±8.3·10−3), suggesting a higher cell-to-cell electrical coupling. Whereas there were no differences between the SW features in both directions in the general population, statistically significant differences were obtained between them in individuals in many cases. Significance. Our results suggest that the SW of the EHG is related to bioelectrical events in the uterus and could provide objective information to clinicians in challenging obstetric scenarios.

Multichannel mapping of in vivo rat uterine myometrium exhibits both high and low frequency electrical activity in non-pregnancy

“…However, often the data is filtered to remove the low frequency information from the data 18 , 23 , 27 – 29 , not considering any slow wave components. Although there has been some limited investigation of slow waves in humans during late pregnancy and labor using non-invasive electrohysterograpy (EHG) 30 – 32 , little is known about both high frequency and low frequency electrophysiology outside of pregnancy.…”