Medicated Intrauterine Devices 1980
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-009-8872-9_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uterine Geometry and IUD Performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most IUCD complications appear to result from mechanical factors (Hasson 1980). The mechanical factors include residence of the device in the uterine isthmus or cervix, endometrialmyometrial injury and myornetrial distension.…”
Section: Relation Between Uterine Geometry and Iucd Design mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most IUCD complications appear to result from mechanical factors (Hasson 1980). The mechanical factors include residence of the device in the uterine isthmus or cervix, endometrialmyometrial injury and myornetrial distension.…”
Section: Relation Between Uterine Geometry and Iucd Design mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whether or not the IUD acts as the sole initiator of these contractile events or is assisted by the effects of prostaglandin release is not known. In contrast, disproportionately small IUDs may not cover enough uterine area to prevent pregnancy, or they may gravitate downwards into the uterine isthmus and/or the cervix where they may also initiate subsequent abnormal events [4,5]. Wheeler and colleagues [7] have shown that increased pain, bleeding and removal rates were directly proportional to device size.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…One of the most important factors affecting IUD performance is the dynamic interaction between the geometric parameters of the host uterus and those of the resident device [4]. Hasson and colleagues observed that high rates of abnormal events occurred when the length of the IUD equalled or exceeded the length of the endometrical cavity or when it was shorter by two or more cm [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, there are many other risk factors for developing PID including: a history of prior PID or abortion, multiple sexual partners, age less than 25 years, and nulliparity [2]. Improper insertion or fitting of the IUD may also contribute to the risk of PID [10]. Generally, previous studies have not evaluated the relative importance of these factors in terms of the risks of PID to IUD users.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%