2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2015.08.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

UTE bi-component analysis of T2* relaxation in articular cartilage

Abstract: SUMMARY Objectives To determine T2* relaxation in articular cartilage using ultrashort echo time (UTE) imaging and bi-component analysis, with an emphasis on the deep radial and calcified cartilage. Methods Ten patellar samples were imaged using two-dimensional (2D) UTE and Car-Purcell-Meiboom-Gill (CPMG) sequences. UTE images were fitted with a bi-component model to calculate T2* and relative fractions. CPMG images were fitted with a single-component model to calculate T2. The high signal line above the su… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
69
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, we measured T1rho at 0° both at the beginning and end of the scan, and found changes less than 5%. Third, patellar cartilage may show a multi-component behavior (13,29,30), but only a single component analysis was performed. Multi-component analysis has a high signal-to-noise ratio demand and may require longer scan time (31), which is difficult with this protocol, which is already 10 hours long.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we measured T1rho at 0° both at the beginning and end of the scan, and found changes less than 5%. Third, patellar cartilage may show a multi-component behavior (13,29,30), but only a single component analysis was performed. Multi-component analysis has a high signal-to-noise ratio demand and may require longer scan time (31), which is difficult with this protocol, which is already 10 hours long.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, changes in T2 and T2* are nonspecific and can be caused by multiple factors including hydration, macromolecular content, and tissue anisotropy with comparable changes occurring in disparate settings [5][6][7][8][9] . Bi-component T2 and T2* mapping techniques have been used to improve the specificity of T2 analysis by assessing the individual water components of musculoskeletal tissues [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] . Bi-component T2 and T2* mapping methods have measured two distinct T2 components in cartilage assumed to represent short relaxing water bound to the macromolecular matrix and long relaxing bulk water [12][13][14]21,22 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bi-component T2 and T2* mapping techniques have been used to improve the specificity of T2 analysis by assessing the individual water components of musculoskeletal tissues [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] . Bi-component T2 and T2* mapping methods have measured two distinct T2 components in cartilage assumed to represent short relaxing water bound to the macromolecular matrix and long relaxing bulk water [12][13][14]21,22 . Bi-component T2* mapping methods have been used in cortical bone to differentiate between water bound to the organic matrix and free water in the Haversian systems [15][16][17] , Bi-component T2 and T2* mapping methods have also been used in the meniscus to differentiate between macromolecular bound water and bulk water [18][19][20] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the improvement of clinical MRI technology, resolving cartilage thickness in 2-4 or more pixels becomes possible for quantitative human MRI (39). Consequently, these pixels of equal size could be used to represent different depths of cartilage (40,41). This type of depth-dependent regional analysis is superior to the bulk analysis, since a regional analysis separates the different characteristics between surface and deep cartilage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%