2015
DOI: 10.1002/oby.21049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Usual breakfast eating habits affect response to breakfast skipping in overweight women

Abstract: Objective This randomized, cross-over trial was designed to investigate the metabolic and appetitive responses to skipping breakfast in overweight women who were habitual breakfast Eaters or Skippers. Design and Methods Nine Eaters and nine Skippers were studied on two separate days during which subjects ate breakfast (B), or had no breakfast (NB), followed by a standard lunch meal 4 hours later. Blood sampling for hormones and metabolites was performed after lunch and appetite was rated throughout the day. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
44
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(43 reference statements)
1
44
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In research, visual analogue scales have been used to assess appetite sensations, such as hunger and fullness, and can provide a reproducible and reliable assessment of subjective appetite (22) . As would be expected, a well-established pattern of appetite suppression has been observed during the morning when breakfast is consumed, compared with when breakfast is omitted (23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31) . However, it is interesting to note that the subjective appetite response to subsequent meals appears to be unaffected by prior omission of breakfast, suggesting that consumption of breakfast only provides a transient suppression of appetite (23,24,(26)(27)(28)(29) .…”
Section: Effect Of Breakfast On Subjective Appetitesupporting
confidence: 60%
“…In research, visual analogue scales have been used to assess appetite sensations, such as hunger and fullness, and can provide a reproducible and reliable assessment of subjective appetite (22) . As would be expected, a well-established pattern of appetite suppression has been observed during the morning when breakfast is consumed, compared with when breakfast is omitted (23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31) . However, it is interesting to note that the subjective appetite response to subsequent meals appears to be unaffected by prior omission of breakfast, suggesting that consumption of breakfast only provides a transient suppression of appetite (23,24,(26)(27)(28)(29) .…”
Section: Effect Of Breakfast On Subjective Appetitesupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Studies that have examined energy intake at both 237 lunch and then dinner (28) or meals plus snacks (31) have not revealed increased intake after morning fasting, refuting the possibility that further compensation occurs throughout the day. This view is 239 also supported by findings of similar energy intake during evening snacks and meals when 240 comparing morning feeding versus fasting followed by a standardised lunch (34) .…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…There is some evidence that DIT is greater in the morning than later in the day (52,53) fasting/feeding, DIT during the afternoon was greater following breakfast (34) or not different 331 relative to fasting when measured 1 and 4 hours after lunch (28) . Where energy intake has been 332 matched across 24 hours following breakfast omission by increasing intake at subsequent meals,…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study was conducted over the course of a single day in individuals who regularly ate breakfast. There is some evidence to suggest that there is entrainment in the response to specific meal patterns over time [49]. …”
Section: Can Smaller Misalignments In Meal Timing Impair Metabolicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This outcome may have been influenced by the greater number of kilojoules that were consumed closer to the time of testing in one condition (i.e., 100% calories between 1700 and 2100, vs. 30%–40% in the 3 meals/day condition). Alternatively, the glucose test was performed at a time that participants were no longer accustomed to eating, which could have impacted results [49]. In a similarly styled study, healthy, lean men underwent an alternate day fasting protocol, fasting from 2200 h until 1800 h the following day.…”
Section: Matching Food Intake With Body Clocksmentioning
confidence: 99%