2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jom.2004.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using worker personality and demographic information to improve system performance prediction

Abstract: This paper presents an approach to modeling workers where human performance has a significant impact on system productivity. Highly technical industries such as semiconductor manufacturing and service industries like banking are relying on fewer but more skilled workers. In these systems, productivity depends on worker availability and organization; therefore, modeling system performance may require accurate representations of individual worker behavior. This paper examines the tradeoffs in including informati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Models have been developed in the areas of job design (e.g., Wong and Campion, 1991) and socio-technical systems (e.g., Bendoly et al, in press;Huber and Brown, 1991) that specifically address the human factors of work systems, and how variation in performance interacts with the task itself. However, except for the recognition that individual differences are a major cause of work-rate variability (Dudley, 1968;Knott and Sury, 1987;Salvendy and Stewart, 1975;Juran and Schruben, 2004), little has traditionally been done to incorporate individual differences into OM research. This has changed recently with the work of Bartholdi and Eisenstein (2005), , and Zavadlav et al (1996).…”
Section: Actionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Models have been developed in the areas of job design (e.g., Wong and Campion, 1991) and socio-technical systems (e.g., Bendoly et al, in press;Huber and Brown, 1991) that specifically address the human factors of work systems, and how variation in performance interacts with the task itself. However, except for the recognition that individual differences are a major cause of work-rate variability (Dudley, 1968;Knott and Sury, 1987;Salvendy and Stewart, 1975;Juran and Schruben, 2004), little has traditionally been done to incorporate individual differences into OM research. This has changed recently with the work of Bartholdi and Eisenstein (2005), , and Zavadlav et al (1996).…”
Section: Actionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Johnson et al (2002) find that the intentions relative to award allocation in a manufacturing setting are partially based on reputation and attribution of motive. Juran and Schruben (2004) show that variability of human reactions should be considered when modeling production systems.…”
Section: Production and Workflow Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter is generally studied with a focus on the allocation based on technical skills of the personnel considered. Indeed, it is proved that the efficiency of a system is closely linked to the allocation of personnel according to their skills [13]. A similar problem that is as well considered in the literature is the team building considering personnel skills.…”
Section: Actors Selection In Planningmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…According to the principle of this doctrine, it is proper to define service productivity by a set of results or output of the service received by customers (Alcantara, 1987;Green, 2003Green, , 2005Juran and Schruben, 2004). Customers' participation in the service process is one of the characteristics which distinguish service industry from manufacturing industry.…”
Section: Effectiveness Doctrinementioning
confidence: 99%