The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2020
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-010919-023537
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using What We Already Have: Uncovering New Drug Repurposing Strategies in Existing Omics Data

Abstract: The promise of drug repurposing is to accelerate the translation of knowledge to treatment of human disease, bypassing common challenges associated with drug development to be more time- and cost-efficient. Repurposing has an increased chance of success due to the previous validation of drug safety and allows for the incorporation of omics. Hypothesis-generating omics processes inform drug repurposing decision-making methods on drug efficacy and toxicity. This review summarizes drug repurposing strategies and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 127 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, pancreatic cancer mortality is projected to be second only to lung cancer by 2030 (7). Hence, this malignant cancer will has a greater chance of success and can save both time and money since drug safety has already been validated (11)(12)(13)(14). Given the advantages of repurposing, we have been seeking to identify CSC-targeting drugs from among existing drugs with established safety profiles, irrespective of whether they have proven efficacy against cancer (15)(16)(17).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, pancreatic cancer mortality is projected to be second only to lung cancer by 2030 (7). Hence, this malignant cancer will has a greater chance of success and can save both time and money since drug safety has already been validated (11)(12)(13)(14). Given the advantages of repurposing, we have been seeking to identify CSC-targeting drugs from among existing drugs with established safety profiles, irrespective of whether they have proven efficacy against cancer (15)(16)(17).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our team of investigators has formed a first-in-kind research collaboration of engineers, informaticians, and clinicians dedicated to the development of computational tools to predict adverse drug outcomes in pregnancy from existing healthcare data on pregnant populations and in vitro drug exposure models that are more representative of pregnant human physiology than the in vivo animal platforms currently employed in this space. This group—called Modeling Adverse Drug Reactions in Embryos (MADRE) 13, 90, 91 —proposes refinement of the teratogenicity QSAR reported in this manuscript by harnessing a more continuous spectrum of relevant phenotype information. Given that data quality and availability issues with teratogenicity scores restricted the scope of this study, we propose a medication history-wide association study (MedWAS) that can leverage billing-encoded, population-level EHR data as a label set.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A hallmark of the binning within this scale is the absence of definitive human data: at present, teratogenicity scores are established pre-clinically by pharmacologists, who evaluate biomarkers of fetal toxicity in animal models 5,6 . This approach is inherently limited, as common in vivo models are not sufficiently representative of human physiology 13 , and human subjects are not included in the teratogenicity scoring process for ethical reasons 11, 14, 15 . Indeed, the limited human data available for teratology scoring are often derived retrospectively from high-profile cases of fetal malformation resulting from drug exposure 9, 16, 17 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most previous reviews of drug repurposing technologies have focused on methods development [3,[21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35], with only a few providing cursory analysis of evaluation of those methods [29,35,36]. Brown and Patel have previously reported a review of "validation" strategies for computational drug repurposing [37], broadly categorizing various evaluation metrics into "(1) validation with a single example or case study of a single disease area, (2) sensitivitybased validation only and (3) both sensitivity-and specificity-based validation" [37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%