2018
DOI: 10.1140/epjp/i2018-12048-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using weighting algorithms to refine source direction determinations in all-sky gravitational wave burst searches with two-detector networks

Abstract: I explore the possibility of resurrecting an old, non-Bayesian computational approach for inferring the source direction of a gravitational wave from the output of a two-detector network. The method gives the beam pattern response functions and time delay, and performs well even in the presence of noise and unexpected signal forms. I further suggest an improvement to this method in the form of a weighting algorithm that usefully improves its accuracy beyond what can be achieved with simple best-fit methods, va… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(20 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Naturally, the performance of a revised algorithm with weighting function f (Q/Q min ) depends entirely upon the function f . As in [1], I focus on weighting functions of the form…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Naturally, the performance of a revised algorithm with weighting function f (Q/Q min ) depends entirely upon the function f . As in [1], I focus on weighting functions of the form…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The algorithm's performance in determining τ is relatively close to this ideal. However, as seen in [1], higher frequency signals and higher maximum levels of noise and un-modeled signal reduce the accuracy of the method in finding beam F + and F × at the two sites. Though the algorithm suffers at higher frequenciesan effect likely due to the fact that even small non-zero values δτ are amplified by the frequency when determining the mismatch of eq.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations