2014 International Conference on Control, Instrumentation, Communication and Computational Technologies (ICCICCT) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/iccicct.2014.6993144
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using weighted majority voting classifier combination for relation classification in biomedical texts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Text processing using deep learning model, feature selection using support vector machine, data pre-processing etc. were mentioned approach to apply [8], [9], [10], [11], [12]. We have proposed to use deep neural network to predict job scams.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Text processing using deep learning model, feature selection using support vector machine, data pre-processing etc. were mentioned approach to apply [8], [9], [10], [11], [12]. We have proposed to use deep neural network to predict job scams.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are the classifier ensemble methods combining multiple outputs of multiple models to increase the performance of the prediction. There are many basic [22], [29] to advanced ensemble methods [30], [31]. However, in this paper, we use the majority voting method.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where the function argmax returns an integer J, which stands for the index of the maximum voting scores. Equations (3) and (4) is the normal weighted majority voting being wildly used [31]. Every classifier has a different voting weight according to its identification accuracy.…”
Section: Defining a Subject Space {Smentioning
confidence: 99%