2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-21843-9_16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Web Objects for Development Effort Estimation of Web Applications: A Replicated Study

Abstract: Abstract. The spreading of Web applications has motivated the definition of size measures suitable for such kind of software systems. Among the proposals existing in the literature, Web Objects were conceived by Reifer specifically for Web applications as an extension of Function Points. In this paper we report on an empirical analysis we performed exploiting 25 Web applications developed by an Italian software company. The results confirm the ones obtained in a previous study and extend them in several aspect… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(67 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Data from 25 web projects were used to empirically analyse the results and it was found that WO performed statistically better effort estimation when used in combination with OLSR or CBR or Web-COBRA estimation techniques than FP as sizing measure. This study further mentioned that WO with web-COBRA produced best results than CBR and OLSR and there is no statically significant difference in results obtained withOLSR, CBR and Web-COBRA [36].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…Data from 25 web projects were used to empirically analyse the results and it was found that WO performed statistically better effort estimation when used in combination with OLSR or CBR or Web-COBRA estimation techniques than FP as sizing measure. This study further mentioned that WO with web-COBRA produced best results than CBR and OLSR and there is no statically significant difference in results obtained withOLSR, CBR and Web-COBRA [36].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…We believe that the results presented in this paper together with a ready-to-use baseline tool can foster more rigorous benchmarking in future effort estimation studies. Moreover, future work could investigate the effectiveness of LP for different effort estimation scenarios (e.g., cross-vs. within-company [Mendes et al 2014;Minku et al 2015], chronological estimation [MacDonell and Shepperd 2003;Sigweni et al 2016], web effort estimation [Di Martino et al 2011;Ferrucci et al 2012;Di Martino et al 2016]) as well as for different estimation tasks in software engineering (e.g., predicting apps' rating [Sarro et al 2018] and size [Ferrucci et al 2015a;2015b], bug-fixing time [Bhattacharya and Neamtiu 2011;Zhang et al 2013]) or in other domains. Besides, future studies could extend the LP model we proposed herein, for example to consider different and multiple optimisation functions [Ferrucci et al 2010a;.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In web application development effort estimations, this technique is the most used one because it provides quite accurate results (Costagliola et al, 2006;Di Martino et al, 2007;Martino et al, 2011;Mendes, 2007;Mendes et al, 2003a;Ruhe et al, 2003). In the study conducted, we tried to predict a web application development effort only on the basis of web application size expressed using CFP.…”
Section: Validation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%