2015
DOI: 10.1080/09658211.2015.1059454
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using warnings to reduce categorical false memories in younger and older adults

Abstract: Warnings about memory errors can reduce their incidence, although past work has largely focused on associative memory errors. The current study sought to explore whether warnings could be tailored to specifically reduce false recall of categorical information in both younger and older populations. Before encoding word pairs designed to induce categorical false memories, half of the younger and older participants were warned to avoid committing these types of memory errors. Older adults who received a warning c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, older adults receiving cue-utilization instructions at retrieval demonstrated fewer false alarms (i.e., incorrectly identifying nonperformed actions as having been performed) as compared to older adults who did not receive instructions (Thomas & Bulevich, 2006). This work is consistent with how general warnings prior to encoding and/or retrieval can reduce false recognition in illusory memory paradigms (Carmichael & Gutchess, 2016; Lane et al, 2008; McCabe & Smith, 2002; Watson et al, 2004). Extending this work to populations with cognitive impairments represents an important next step.…”
Section: The Imagination Inflation Effect For Performed Actionssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Indeed, older adults receiving cue-utilization instructions at retrieval demonstrated fewer false alarms (i.e., incorrectly identifying nonperformed actions as having been performed) as compared to older adults who did not receive instructions (Thomas & Bulevich, 2006). This work is consistent with how general warnings prior to encoding and/or retrieval can reduce false recognition in illusory memory paradigms (Carmichael & Gutchess, 2016; Lane et al, 2008; McCabe & Smith, 2002; Watson et al, 2004). Extending this work to populations with cognitive impairments represents an important next step.…”
Section: The Imagination Inflation Effect For Performed Actionssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…It is evident that understanding the cognitive underpinnings of age-related increases in false memory susceptibility can inform strategies to improve memory accuracy in older adults. For instance, providing warnings of potential misinformation in memory accounts can reduce false alarms in older adults (Carmichael and Gutchess, 2015; Coane et al, 2015; Dodson et al, 2015; Watson et al, 2004). Moreover, directing attention towards differentiating information at encoding or retrieval (Dodson and Schacter, 2002; Koutstaal et al, 1999; Schacter et al, 1999), or encouraging careful consideration of source during recall (Henkel, 2008), also reduces age differences in false memories.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, a variety of factors have consistently been proven to be effective at reducing false recognition. These include provision of explicit warnings prior to testing about the effect of false memory (Carmichael & Gutchess, 2016;Gallo, Roberts, & Seamon, 1997;Mccabe & Smith, 2002;Mcdermott & Roediger, 1998;Watson, Mcdermott, & Balota, 2004), higher levels of post-learning arousal (Nielson & Correro, 2017;Nitschke, Chu, Pruessner, Bartz, & Sheldon, 2019), social stress experienced before learning or at retrieval (Diekelmann, Wilhelm, Wagner, & Born, 2011;Pardilla-Delgado, Alger, Cunningham, Kinealy, & Payne, 2015;Smeets, Otgaar, Candel, & Wolf, 2008;Zoladz et al, 2014), and induced negative affect (Forgas, Laham, & Vargas, 2015;Storbeck, 2013;Storbeck & Clore, 2005. Moreover, social collaboration has also been shown to be capable of improving recall and recognition (Rajaram & Pereira-Pasarin, 2007;Weldon & Bellinger, 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%