Abstract:We report the outcomes of an evaluation of a 'video club' intervention to improve the feedback and dialogic teaching practice of 91 teachers from 11 primary schools in England. Participating teachers worked collaboratively in a sequence of six video clubs over a six-month period. To understand teacher engagement we examine videos of video club meetings; online platform use metrics; surveys; selected videos of classroom practice; focus groups and interviews. We evaluate change in teachers' thinking and practice… Show more
“…Verbal feedback is frequently placed within the context of dialogue. From this perspective, feedback is seen as a ‘move’ within a dialogic teaching and learning approach (Hennessy et al., 2016; Perry et al., 2020). Feedback, for example, can range from a simple judgement of correctness, identification of a part of an answer that could be developed or improved, referring back to prior contributions, and inviting opinions or ideas.…”
Feedback is an integral part of education and there is a substantial body of trials exploring and confirming its effect on learning. This evidence base comes mostly from studies of compulsory school age children; there is very little evidence to support effective feedback practice at higher education, beyond the frameworks and strategies advocated by those claiming expertise in the area. This systematic review aims to address this gap. We review causal evidence from trials of feedback and formative assessment in higher education. Although the evidence base is currently limited, our results suggest that low stakes‐quizzing is a particularly powerful approach and that there are benefits for forms of peer and tutor feedback, although these depend on implementation factors. There was mixed evidence for praise, grading and technology‐based feedback. We organise our findings into several evidence‐grounded categories and discuss the next steps for the field and evidence‐informed feedback practice in universities.
“…Verbal feedback is frequently placed within the context of dialogue. From this perspective, feedback is seen as a ‘move’ within a dialogic teaching and learning approach (Hennessy et al., 2016; Perry et al., 2020). Feedback, for example, can range from a simple judgement of correctness, identification of a part of an answer that could be developed or improved, referring back to prior contributions, and inviting opinions or ideas.…”
Feedback is an integral part of education and there is a substantial body of trials exploring and confirming its effect on learning. This evidence base comes mostly from studies of compulsory school age children; there is very little evidence to support effective feedback practice at higher education, beyond the frameworks and strategies advocated by those claiming expertise in the area. This systematic review aims to address this gap. We review causal evidence from trials of feedback and formative assessment in higher education. Although the evidence base is currently limited, our results suggest that low stakes‐quizzing is a particularly powerful approach and that there are benefits for forms of peer and tutor feedback, although these depend on implementation factors. There was mixed evidence for praise, grading and technology‐based feedback. We organise our findings into several evidence‐grounded categories and discuss the next steps for the field and evidence‐informed feedback practice in universities.
“…The literature on the use of classroom video for professional learning is summarized and discussed in Perry et al (2020) [35]; a short summary of selected points from this is provided below, along with an example. Perry • It is efficient, in that the most instructive videos can be viewed repeatedly by a wider audience.…”
Section: Mode 3-classroom Observations With Feedback And/or Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be seen in relation to online professional learning communities in Lantz-Andersson et al (2018, p. 310) [59] where communities with a 'friendly, participatory culture' are supportive of experimentation, risk taking and searching discussion and feedback. This culture can take time to develop (as discussed in relation to video sharing and discussion in Perry et al, 2020) [35]. It is a relatively widespread view that community building and functioning benefits from (a) there being an 'established history of sharing and working together' outside of the program (Seddon et al, 2012, p. 436) [30] and (b) there being face-to-face sessions which take place prior to or in between online activity (i.e., within a blended format) (Seddon et al, 2012;Owston et al, 2008;Matzat, 2013;Keengwe and Kang, 2013) [30,55,64,68].…”
Section: Community Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Lantz-Andersson et al, 2018, p. 308) [59] Picking up themes noted in our earlier sections, Surrette and Johnson (2015) [63] found studies noting the benefits of being able to 'rewind and review the video and record more complete and accurate comments than is possible during real-time observations' (West et al, 2009, p. 384, quoted in Surrette and Johnson, 2015, p. 263) [63,75]. Using video, there is also a greater opportunity to conduct the reflections and discussions collaboratively, drawing on a greater number of examples (Perry et al, 2020) [35]. Other authors such as Keengwe and Kang (2013) [64] conclude that technological tools are important for integrating online and face-to-face learning and supporting learning to be put into practice, and also-as above-discuss the value of using technology to allow teachers to 'actively participate, communicate, and create their own materials' (p. 488).…”
Section: Theory and Practice Experimentation And Contextualisationmentioning
Initial and continuing teacher education are increasingly making use of remote and blended modes of education. Conducted in the summer of 2020 during the COVID-19 pandemic, this rapid review brings together literature and evidence to inform planning for remote and blended teacher education during restrictions in face-to-face teaching activity. The review consists of three main parts: first, a descriptive framework of modes of remote and blended teacher education; second, an exploratory review of the affordances and limitations of remote and blended approaches connecting the literature on effective teacher education with reviews of remote and blended approaches; third, a rapid review of evidence on the efficacy of remote and blended approaches, including of a small number of studies comparing these to face-to-face equivalents. We conclude that remote and blended teacher education is likely to become an increasingly important part of the teacher education landscape and there are plausible theoretical reasons suggesting that it can be effective with suitable design. However, we find too few studies presenting robust evidence to enable firm conclusions to be drawn on the relative effectiveness of modes and approaches. The review provides a foundation for further research and practice in this area.
“…After a presentation is recorded and stored in the system, students can reflect on their performance and receive feedback from their lecturers and classmates if this is desirable. Video reflection on communicative performance has been used successfully in many academic and professional fields, such as language learning, medical studies teacher training, engineering, and economics, as well as other science and social studies fields (e.g., Budiarta & Santosa, 2020;Carr et al, 2020;Cochrane & O'Donoghue, 2008;Er & Planas, 2005;Galindo et al, 2020;Gong et al, 2019;Miskam & Saidalvi, 2020;Oliveira, et al, 2021;Penny & Coe, 2004;Perry et al, 2020;Ram, et al, 1999;Zick et al, 2007). By reflecting on a video presentation, students can pinpoint their strengths and weaknesses in all aspects of the presentation, including the content (Miskam & Saidalvi, 2019Oliveira, et al, 2021;Tuyet & Khang, 2020).…”
Oral communication and presentation skills are considered key competencies for many academic fields and professions, including science-related ones. Therefore, it is vital that students are given sufficient class time in the curriculum for practicing public speaking. It is well documented in the literature that video technology can be of valuable aid in enhancing oral skills, and FlipGrid is a relatively new video discussion platform that has become popular for this purpose. The aim of this study is two-fold. First, the literature regarding FlipGrid is explored to understand how educators around the globe use the platform. Second, a case study is presented where FlipGrid is used and evaluated as a tool for practicing and assessing oral science communication. A mixed-method approach was used to evaluate FlipGrid with the participation of 112 students. Findings indicate that although the use FlipGrid in science fields is limited, it can be a useful platform for practicing oral science communication.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.