2016
DOI: 10.4236/ajps.2016.715193
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Vegetation Indices as Input into Random Forest for Soybean and Weed Classification

Abstract: Weed management is a major component of a soybean (Glycine max L.) production system; thus, managers need tools to help them distinguish soybean from weeds. Vegetation indices derived from light reflectance properties of plants have shown promise as tools to enhance differences among plants. The objective of this study was to evaluate normalized difference vegetation indices derived from multispectral leaf reflectance data as input into random forest machine learner to differentiate soybean and three broad lea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
19
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
3
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The data on the assessment of the spectral predictors used in the MY models indicates a paramount contribution of VIs in the prediction of crops as compared to the individual bands. A similar conclusion was drawn by Fletcher [59] in the discrimination of soybean and three weed species. The highest contribution of VIs in the prediction of the crops was expected since their calculation involved two or more bands and as a result, used the unique spectral characteristics of the individual bands to produce a single layer which captured the different phenological dynamics among the crops.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The data on the assessment of the spectral predictors used in the MY models indicates a paramount contribution of VIs in the prediction of crops as compared to the individual bands. A similar conclusion was drawn by Fletcher [59] in the discrimination of soybean and three weed species. The highest contribution of VIs in the prediction of the crops was expected since their calculation involved two or more bands and as a result, used the unique spectral characteristics of the individual bands to produce a single layer which captured the different phenological dynamics among the crops.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The highest contribution of VIs in the prediction of the crops was expected since their calculation involved two or more bands and as a result, used the unique spectral characteristics of the individual bands to produce a single layer which captured the different phenological dynamics among the crops. Vegetation indices, which are based on SWIR and NIR spectral bands, are known for their contributions to plant separation [59]. Therefore, despite the contributions of the other predictor variables, the late summer NDMI is ranked as the topmost dominant predictor variables for almost all years, followed by early summer NDVI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RF classifier has been given increasing attention with regards to crop mapping [37][38][39]. The RF classifier has been proven to be stable and relatively efficient to yield overall accuracy levels that are either comparable to or better than other classifiers such as decision trees, neural networks and SVM [40].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the VI information was not used in their study. Fletcher [23] introduced vegetation indices as new features in the random forest for the classification of soybeans and weeds and confirmed the positive effect of vegetation indices, and the overall accuracy of 90.8% and the kappa coefficient of 0.878 were obtained using the image (30 June 2014). Zheng et al [14] classified various types of crops by using a support vector machine classifier using the NDVI time series data that was extracted from Landsat images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…The effect of these factors also depends on the choice of the classifier [21]. Some studies have been done to address some of these issues [22][23][24][25]. For example, the optimal number and dates of images for land cover classification are identified with feature importance obtained by RF classifier on remote sensing time-series [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%