Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2019
DOI: 10.3390/drones3030054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) and Object-Based Image Analysis (OBIA) for Measuring Plant-Soil Feedback Effects on Crop Productivity

Abstract: Unmanned aerial system (UAS) acquired high-resolution optical imagery and object-based image analysis (OBIA) techniques have the potential to provide spatial crop productivity information. In general, plant-soil feedback (PSF) field studies are time-consuming and laborious which constrain the scale at which these studies can be performed. Development of non-destructive methodologies is needed to enable research under actual field conditions and at realistic spatial and temporal scales. In this study, the influ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, all calculated phenological indexes (maxNDVI, Time Integrated NDVI and GrowthRate) significantly correlated with maize biomass and N uptake (Supplementary Figure S4). This also shows the potential of this approach to predict yield and N uptake over larger areas and therefore potentially be used to adapt fertilization depending on crop needs (Maresma et al, 2016;Nuijten et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Finally, all calculated phenological indexes (maxNDVI, Time Integrated NDVI and GrowthRate) significantly correlated with maize biomass and N uptake (Supplementary Figure S4). This also shows the potential of this approach to predict yield and N uptake over larger areas and therefore potentially be used to adapt fertilization depending on crop needs (Maresma et al, 2016;Nuijten et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Soils are opaque, yet remote and proximal sensing of bare topsoil and of plants responding to soil variation enables the characterization of soil variation for precision agriculture, limiting negative side-effects of fertilizer use and pest control [75]. Moreover, these technologies can help to better understand and quantify plant-soil feedback interactions in the field and to integrate beneficial ecological interactions in land management from local to regional scale [69,76,77]. Also for monitoring biodiversity, sensing technology is an asset especially when used in combination with in situ activity sensors and DNA barcoding [78,79].…”
Section: Soil and Habitat Conservation And Regenerationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These approaches have seen relatively little application for detecting ASM, but a successful implementation for general rainforest LULC change analysis (including mining) is found in Souza-Filho et al (2018) with commission/omission errors in the range of 10-30%. However, finding adequate parameters for the initial object segmentation can be labour intensive and relies on good domain knowledge (Nuijten et al, 2019). All methods to date have required a significant level of human input, including feature and segmentation parameter design, manual cluster selection and manual relabelling of incorrect pixels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%