2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.pmcj.2014.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using unlabeled data in a sparse-coding framework for human activity recognition

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
77
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
77
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to heuristic feature design, where domain specific expert knowledge is exploited to manually design features such as described above, the goal is to automatically discover meaningful representations of data. This is usually done by optimising an objective function that captures the appropriateness of the features, such as by energy minimisation or so-called "deep learning" (see [35] for a review) Building on this [36] developed sparse-coding framework for activity recognition exploits unlabelled sample data, whilst learning meaningful sparse feature representations. The authors give results on a benchmark dataset showing that their feature learning approach outperforms state-of-the-art approaches to analysing ADL, and claim that their approach will generalise well (see Section 2.7 for further discussion of this).…”
Section: Survey Of Feature Extraction Pipelinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast to heuristic feature design, where domain specific expert knowledge is exploited to manually design features such as described above, the goal is to automatically discover meaningful representations of data. This is usually done by optimising an objective function that captures the appropriateness of the features, such as by energy minimisation or so-called "deep learning" (see [35] for a review) Building on this [36] developed sparse-coding framework for activity recognition exploits unlabelled sample data, whilst learning meaningful sparse feature representations. The authors give results on a benchmark dataset showing that their feature learning approach outperforms state-of-the-art approaches to analysing ADL, and claim that their approach will generalise well (see Section 2.7 for further discussion of this).…”
Section: Survey Of Feature Extraction Pipelinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A related approach was taken by [36], using a sparse-coding framework for human activity recognition. In this case the authors used a clustering approach to group together sparse codes, rather than full CSC.…”
Section: Fixed Dictionariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Plotz [11] used restricted Boltzmann machines to extract features. Li [12] and Bhattacharya [13] both used sparse-coding to extract features.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…location, time, work and other commitments) and addressing cost concerns. Furthermore, providing patients with marker of performance and ensuring a correct understanding of the content of rehabilitation will keep them motivated while supporting self-management [10], [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%