“…They are userfriendly, inexpensive technologies that can be broadly scaled to include a large number of users (Fischer and Reuber, 2011); however, social media has mixed connotations within academia. Some see social media as a waste of time and effort; some view it as a valuable network for personal interactions (Schnitzler et al, 2016); and others understand it can be a vast instrument of meaningful engagement. For example, three of the authors (J. Brosnan, J. Hoyle, and E. Stafne) had total engagements (clicks + retweets + likes + replies) for 9 months (Jan. to Sept. 2016) totaling 11,098.…”
Section: Symposiummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most individual learners do not have access to research literature or the desire to read it. Social media can break down that barrier, providing an accessible format to share information (Schnitzler et al, 2016), and facilitate independent learning. For example, tweeting side-by-side images of a healthy and diseased lima bean (Phaseolus lunatus) with 140 characters of information is likely more accessible than a research article on downy mildew and its' impact.…”
Section: Symposiummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Retweeting, reposting or forwarding a message posted by another user, is a good way to expand the reach of extension stories from colleagues. In a guide for researchers' Twitter use, Schnitzler et al (2016) recommend engaging in professional conversations and avoiding bias. It is critical to remember the digital footprint left in online engagement and the future implications of publicly expressing a bias.…”
We held a technology session at the 2016 Annual Meeting of the American Society for Horticultural Science in Atlanta, GA, to provide guidance for technology choices in extension education and an opportunity to learn more about engaging new audiences, including the millennial generation (people born between 1982 and 2000). The use of technology is now an integral part of extension-client interaction. Presenters in the session gave examples of when technologies such as blogs, social media accounts, or web conferencing tools allowed extension personnel to increase engagement with online consumers and ultimately help fulfill extension’s mission of extending knowledge and changing lives. Effective engagement requires both educators and learners to be satisfied with the exchange. It is critical to monitor the quality of these digitally facilitated exchanges as compared with traditional face-to-face interactions. Additionally, it is possible to quantify digital engagement with readily available metrics, such as “retweets” (a reposted or forwarded message) or “likes” (indication an item is appreciated). These allow innovative and substantive reporting to further justify continued use of digital technologies for enhancing client-extension relations.
“…They are userfriendly, inexpensive technologies that can be broadly scaled to include a large number of users (Fischer and Reuber, 2011); however, social media has mixed connotations within academia. Some see social media as a waste of time and effort; some view it as a valuable network for personal interactions (Schnitzler et al, 2016); and others understand it can be a vast instrument of meaningful engagement. For example, three of the authors (J. Brosnan, J. Hoyle, and E. Stafne) had total engagements (clicks + retweets + likes + replies) for 9 months (Jan. to Sept. 2016) totaling 11,098.…”
Section: Symposiummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most individual learners do not have access to research literature or the desire to read it. Social media can break down that barrier, providing an accessible format to share information (Schnitzler et al, 2016), and facilitate independent learning. For example, tweeting side-by-side images of a healthy and diseased lima bean (Phaseolus lunatus) with 140 characters of information is likely more accessible than a research article on downy mildew and its' impact.…”
Section: Symposiummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Retweeting, reposting or forwarding a message posted by another user, is a good way to expand the reach of extension stories from colleagues. In a guide for researchers' Twitter use, Schnitzler et al (2016) recommend engaging in professional conversations and avoiding bias. It is critical to remember the digital footprint left in online engagement and the future implications of publicly expressing a bias.…”
We held a technology session at the 2016 Annual Meeting of the American Society for Horticultural Science in Atlanta, GA, to provide guidance for technology choices in extension education and an opportunity to learn more about engaging new audiences, including the millennial generation (people born between 1982 and 2000). The use of technology is now an integral part of extension-client interaction. Presenters in the session gave examples of when technologies such as blogs, social media accounts, or web conferencing tools allowed extension personnel to increase engagement with online consumers and ultimately help fulfill extension’s mission of extending knowledge and changing lives. Effective engagement requires both educators and learners to be satisfied with the exchange. It is critical to monitor the quality of these digitally facilitated exchanges as compared with traditional face-to-face interactions. Additionally, it is possible to quantify digital engagement with readily available metrics, such as “retweets” (a reposted or forwarded message) or “likes” (indication an item is appreciated). These allow innovative and substantive reporting to further justify continued use of digital technologies for enhancing client-extension relations.
“…If you have published the hard work has only started 12 . Social media can help build traffic for an article, ensuring that work will be read, spread, and cited beyond the confines of journal web sites 13 .…”
Section: So Far This Editorial Has Looked At the Opportunities Socialmentioning
“…Schnitzler et al [9] studied how to enhance the research impact for researchers by using Twitter as an empirical study, the results indicated that Microblogging was considered as an effective channel to promote the research impact. Zhang et al [10] conducted a survey of Wechat and applied the structural equation modeling (SEM) method to investigate how to retain network users, and revealed that social value and hedonic value matters considerably in users' continuance intention.…”
Abstract-Nowadays, social networks greatly affect people's daily life. However, the need to evaluate the dissemination impact of social networks based on multiple criteria has become a necessity. In this paper, the authors construct an evaluation index system, develop an entropy and Analytic Hierarchy Process hybrid model, and derive the priority among the alternative social networks, including Facebook, Twitter, Snapchat, Wechat and Sina Microblogging, based on the bybrid weight, which is determined by the entropy weight and Analytic Hierarchy Process weight. The results reveal that the impact of social networks is influenced by several key performance indicators, including the number of daily active users (DAU), the growth rate of DAU, the average number of messages released per day, net profit, and market value. The study shed some lights on multi-criteria decision making in social networks.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.