2009
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-10-575
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using transcriptome profiling to characterize QTL regions on chicken chromosome 5

Abstract: BackgroundAlthough many QTL for various traits have been mapped in livestock, location confidence intervals remain wide that makes difficult the identification of causative mutations. The aim of this study was to test the contribution of microarray data to QTL detection in livestock species. Three different but complementary approaches are proposed to improve characterization of a chicken QTL region for abdominal fatness (AF) previously detected on chromosome 5 (GGA5).ResultsHepatic transcriptome profiles for … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…a focus on genomic variation and a focus on expression of causal pathways) are likely to identify common, but also unique sets of genes involved in regulation of heritable quantitative traits (e.g. Le Mignon et al 2009). For instance, there may be no genomic variation in some of the genes that play a crucial role in the pathway.…”
Section: Different Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…a focus on genomic variation and a focus on expression of causal pathways) are likely to identify common, but also unique sets of genes involved in regulation of heritable quantitative traits (e.g. Le Mignon et al 2009). For instance, there may be no genomic variation in some of the genes that play a crucial role in the pathway.…”
Section: Different Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these studies, eQTL were mapped using linkage analysis in which the locus affecting gene expression was traced by segregation through genetic crosses in experimental organisms, human families, or livestock species (Kruglyak 2008;Le Mignon et al 2009;van Nas et al 2010). A weakness of such studies in the case of mammals is that the mapping resolution was poor, generally in the range of tens to hundreds of genes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As indicated in Figure 2B, the majority of analyses gave the same LRT curves with the expected AF QTL located around 168 cM on the chromosome 5 [12]. However, after removing the lean subtype called lean2, a new significant QTL (p-value < 0.05) was detected on a proximal chromosome 5 locus around 100 cM with an effect of 1.19 phenotypic standard deviation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 74%