2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2016.01.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing to Identify Best Practices in Academic Libraries

Abstract: Este documento contiene información de prueba. Contáctese con el administrador del Centro para el acceso al documento originar del registro.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, many other studies such as King et al, (2010) Mahama et al, (2013). Siguenza-Guzman et al, (2016).reported mixed findings in which significant negative relationship or no significant relationship were found between costing practices and performance. Moreover, majority of the research are conducted in US, UK and some nations other than Sudan while large number of them were conducted on large firms.…”
Section: Costing Practices and Performancementioning
confidence: 95%
“…However, many other studies such as King et al, (2010) Mahama et al, (2013). Siguenza-Guzman et al, (2016).reported mixed findings in which significant negative relationship or no significant relationship were found between costing practices and performance. Moreover, majority of the research are conducted in US, UK and some nations other than Sudan while large number of them were conducted on large firms.…”
Section: Costing Practices and Performancementioning
confidence: 95%
“…According to Kaplan et al [43], existing cost systems in healthcare rely on inaccurate and arbitrary cost allocation, while providing little transparency to guide firstline care providers in attempts to understand and change the proper drivers of their costs. They also argue that these systems prevent clinician-driven cost reduction and process improvement initiatives, proposing time-driven activity-based costing • More accurate cost estimates [12] • Possible inaccuracy of time estimates [15,35] • Better use of resources, activities and processes, increasing the capacity used and eliminating those that do not add value [23,43,91] • Time needed to determine time estimates [76] • Process optimization, trying to reduce time consumed by some activities [35] • Best benchmarking model [76] • Efficiency in allocating costs to the cost object [44] (TDABC) as one tool with significant potential to fill this gap. However, its application to healthcare has been limited.…”
Section: Costs Of Delivering the Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This includes the interplay between BSC and TQM (Hoque, 2003;Modell, 2009), linking target costing to other tools and processes (Ansari et al, 2007), combining quality cost measurements and accounting reports (Fons, 2012). Adding to this list is also a stream of ABC studies, such as the interconnection between ABC and benchmarking (Siguenza-Guzman et al, 2016), ABC and supply chain costing (Schulze et al, 2012), ABC and LCC (Emblemsvag, 2001) as well as value management and ABC (Salem-Mhamdia & Ghadhab, 2012).…”
Section: Review Of Prior Literature a Glimpse Of Sma Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, there is an upcoming trend calling for examining a combination of SMA tools simultaneously. For instance, Emblemsvag (2001) presented a new cost evaluation model combining ABC and LCC, namely activity-based life cycle costing, while Cardinaels et al (2004) suggested future studies to explore how ABC costing interacts with other tools, and Siguenza-Guzman et al (2016) noted the interrelationship between ABC and benchmarking. More importantly, building upon Brown (2005), Malmi and Brown (2008) espouse that management control systems (MCS) do not operate in isolation, instead as a package, and several subsequent studies have taken this path of the MCS package (Meer-Kooistra & Scapens, 2008;O'Grady & Akroyd, 2016;Sandelin, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%