2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2007.01.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using the Wisconsin–Ohio Reference Evaluation Program (WOREP) to Improve Training and Reference Services

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The disparity in librarian and patron perceptions of success have surfaced in other studies as well. One study showed that patrons were substantially less satisfied than librarians believe them to be (Novotny and Rimland, 2007). In this study, librarians generally spent about 5 minutes or fewer with patrons, often referred them to only one resource, and patrons reported not receiving enough information or help with their question.…”
Section: Artificiality and Levels Of Confidencementioning
confidence: 63%
“…The disparity in librarian and patron perceptions of success have surfaced in other studies as well. One study showed that patrons were substantially less satisfied than librarians believe them to be (Novotny and Rimland, 2007). In this study, librarians generally spent about 5 minutes or fewer with patrons, often referred them to only one resource, and patrons reported not receiving enough information or help with their question.…”
Section: Artificiality and Levels Of Confidencementioning
confidence: 63%
“…Novotny and Rimland used a standardized survey instrument, the Wisconsin-Ohio Reference Evaluation Program, to examine the ways in which reference librarians answer questions (Novotny and Rimland 2007). Results indicated that these librarians answered questions quickly, tended to use a single source to answer questions, and felt the reference exchange produced successful results.…”
Section: Training Within Librariesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Based on these results, which were contrary to results from peer institutions and the customers, training was developed to increase librarians' awareness of the tools they used and how they answered questions. This successful venture encouraged the librarians to seek more training activities in the future (Novotny and Rimland 2007).…”
Section: Training Within Librariesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Another assessment method I am interested in exploring is Wisconsin-Ohio Reference Evaluation project, which has been used by the Penn State University Libraries in the early 2000s in two areas of the library (Novotny & Rimland, 2007;Paster, Fescemyer, Henry, Hughes, & Smith, 2006). Pearson (2014) says "the image of a librarian as friend, mentor, and information provider creates a powerful positive symbol for customers" (p. 178).…”
Section: Conclusion and Next Stepsmentioning
confidence: 99%