Abstract:A multiple-baseline design was used to evaluate the effects of the Title, Examine, Look, Look, and Setting (TELLS) prereading procedure on reading comprehension in 3, ninth-grade students with reading skills deficits. Results suggest that the TELLS procedure enhanced both comprehension levels and rates across all three students. These comprehension skills, however, did not appear to generalize across passages, suggesting that TELLS may be an effective, but not a particularly efficient prereading strategy. Addi… Show more
“…Hale et al (2011) also found a strong correlation between median aloud C-rate scores and BRC scores with sixth-, seventh-, and eighth-grade samples ( r = .723). Researchers using group and within-student repeated-measures designs demonstrated that aloud C-rate was sensitive and stable enough to evaluate treatments and detect differential treatment effects (Freeland et al, 2000; Hale et al, 2005; McDaniel et al, 2001; Ridge & Skinner, 2011; Skinner, Robinson, Adamson, Atchison, & Woodward, 1998).…”
Maze and reading comprehension rate measures are calculated by using measures of reading speed and measures of accuracy (i.e., correctly selected words or answers). In sixth-and seventhgrade samples, we found that the measures of reading speed embedded within our Maze measures accounted for 50% and 39% of broad reading score (BRS) variance, respectively. Combining reading speed with Maze accuracy to form Maze rate increased explained BRS variance by <2%. For our comprehension measures, reading speed accounted for 22% and 36% of BRS variance, which increased significantly to 49% and 44% when our reading comprehension rate measures were added to our models. Discussion focuses on the relationships between the measure of aloud reading speed embedded within many brief reading rate measures and the validity and sensitivity of these measures.
“…Hale et al (2011) also found a strong correlation between median aloud C-rate scores and BRC scores with sixth-, seventh-, and eighth-grade samples ( r = .723). Researchers using group and within-student repeated-measures designs demonstrated that aloud C-rate was sensitive and stable enough to evaluate treatments and detect differential treatment effects (Freeland et al, 2000; Hale et al, 2005; McDaniel et al, 2001; Ridge & Skinner, 2011; Skinner, Robinson, Adamson, Atchison, & Woodward, 1998).…”
Maze and reading comprehension rate measures are calculated by using measures of reading speed and measures of accuracy (i.e., correctly selected words or answers). In sixth-and seventhgrade samples, we found that the measures of reading speed embedded within our Maze measures accounted for 50% and 39% of broad reading score (BRS) variance, respectively. Combining reading speed with Maze accuracy to form Maze rate increased explained BRS variance by <2%. For our comprehension measures, reading speed accounted for 22% and 36% of BRS variance, which increased significantly to 49% and 44% when our reading comprehension rate measures were added to our models. Discussion focuses on the relationships between the measure of aloud reading speed embedded within many brief reading rate measures and the validity and sensitivity of these measures.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.