2016
DOI: 10.1080/0309877x.2016.1159289
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using the Teaching Perspectives Inventory (TPI) to examine the relationship between teaching perspectives and disciplines in higher education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
9
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Biglan (1973a, 1973b) proposed a discipline classification scheme in which academic areas were clustered based on their (a) concern with a single paradigm (hard vs. soft) (dimension I), (b) concern with their application (pure vs. applied) (dimension II), and (c) concern with the life system (life system vs. non-life system) (dimension III). Dimension III is generally less recognized and less cited than other dimensions (Simpson, 2017), although Rotidi et al (2017) proposed that a better differentiation of Biglan’s classification scheme can be concluded for dimension III than for dimension I or dimension II. Dimension I and dimension II have been suggested to have current validity among a wide range of higher education systems (Simpson, 2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biglan (1973a, 1973b) proposed a discipline classification scheme in which academic areas were clustered based on their (a) concern with a single paradigm (hard vs. soft) (dimension I), (b) concern with their application (pure vs. applied) (dimension II), and (c) concern with the life system (life system vs. non-life system) (dimension III). Dimension III is generally less recognized and less cited than other dimensions (Simpson, 2017), although Rotidi et al (2017) proposed that a better differentiation of Biglan’s classification scheme can be concluded for dimension III than for dimension I or dimension II. Dimension I and dimension II have been suggested to have current validity among a wide range of higher education systems (Simpson, 2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given students' views on how mobile devices contribute to the way they learn, we believe that mobile devices can support distance learning as well. Students suggested that the utilization of mobile devices by higher education teachers as modern teaching approaches enhance collaboration and interaction (Rotidi et al, 2017). We also consider that mobile applications designers could create environments that mediate the learning process, permitting the mobile usage in class for learning purposes.…”
Section: Suggestions and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…that seem to distract the student and generally create problems in the educational process (Santos et al, 2018). Furthermore, academic staff needs to comprehensively understand the contribution of mobile devices as an innovative tool in the educational process (Rotidi et al, 2017). In this context, teachers could support and promote the learning of specific mobile applications.…”
Section: Suggestions and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research on this classification system indicates that hard fields emphasise the professional preparation of students through the learning of facts, principles, and concepts. Soft fields, in contrast, emphasise general knowledge, personality development through the promotion of critical thinking and reasoning, communication, as well as formation of values (Rotidi et al, 2017).…”
Section: Ways Of Knowing and Ways Of Teachingmentioning
confidence: 99%