2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2018.05.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using the RE-AIM framework to evaluate a school-based municipal programme tripling time spent on PE

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of the 27 papers included in this review and outlined in Table 1, five employed a qualitative study design [45, 54, 57, 59, 61], nine a quantitative design [42, 44, 48, 5052, 60, 62, 65], ten utilised mixed-methods [40, 41, 43, 46, 47, 55, 59, 63, 64, 66], and three included summary articles which collated previous findings and discussed lessons learned across multiple publications for a specific intervention [49, 53, 56]. Interventions conducted in the articles were delivered in six high income countries, as categorised by the World Bank [67]: USA [4144, 4851, 56, 58, 60, 65, 66], Canada [52, 53, 59], Netherlands [46, 47, 6164], United Kingdom [45, 57], Australia [40], and Denmark [54, 55]. Further, interventions were conducted in a range of school settings including primary/elementary [40, 42, 4447, 49, 51, 5457], middle [43, 48, 66], primary/middle [52, 53, 59], high [58], pre-vocational [6164], and all ages (primary, middle and high) [41, 50].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the 27 papers included in this review and outlined in Table 1, five employed a qualitative study design [45, 54, 57, 59, 61], nine a quantitative design [42, 44, 48, 5052, 60, 62, 65], ten utilised mixed-methods [40, 41, 43, 46, 47, 55, 59, 63, 64, 66], and three included summary articles which collated previous findings and discussed lessons learned across multiple publications for a specific intervention [49, 53, 56]. Interventions conducted in the articles were delivered in six high income countries, as categorised by the World Bank [67]: USA [4144, 4851, 56, 58, 60, 65, 66], Canada [52, 53, 59], Netherlands [46, 47, 6164], United Kingdom [45, 57], Australia [40], and Denmark [54, 55]. Further, interventions were conducted in a range of school settings including primary/elementary [40, 42, 4447, 49, 51, 5457], middle [43, 48, 66], primary/middle [52, 53, 59], high [58], pre-vocational [6164], and all ages (primary, middle and high) [41, 50].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, motivated school staff is an important factor for the implementation process and has been iden ed to affect both adoption, implementation, and maintenance [35,51]. This is in line with Nielsen et al (2018), highlighting the importance of training in order to ensure teachers level of skills and self-e cacy, both affecting their motivation and dedication to the innovation.…”
Section: Motivation Of School Staffmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Results from the interviews revealed that all schools in that municipality were economically supported by the municipality if the schools chose to become part of their municipal PA programme, tripling the amount of weekly PE. This case is a great example of a successful implementation process, with active involvement of both schools and municipalities, developing a shared strategy [43].…”
Section: Municipal Supportmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The present study explores the Svendborgproject (SP) -a programme proved to triple the amount of physical education (PE), documenting decreased incidence of overweight, obesity and cardiovascular risk factors (Klakk, Andersen, Heidemann, Moller, et al, 2014;Klakk, Chinapaw, Heidemann, Andersen, et al, 2013) and been sustained for 10-years (Nielsen, Skovgaard, Bredahl, Bugge, et al, 2018). Previous process evaluations studies of SP have established that the programme has been implemented and maintained with high fidelity as well as programme managers' perspective on influential implementation factors (Nielsen, Klakk, Bugge, Andreasen, et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%