1993
DOI: 10.1097/00003072-199302000-00003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using the Radionuclide Salivagram to Detect Pulmonary Aspiration and Esophageal Dysmotility

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This compares with 25% of 20 children with respiratory disease studied by Boonyaprapa et al (1980). None of the 13 patients studied by Levin et al (1993) had a positive scan, whereas 5% of the children with gastro-oesophageal reflux, 20% of the children with apparent life-threatening events, and 23% of the children with recurrent respiratory events studied by McVeagh et al (1987) had a positive scan.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This compares with 25% of 20 children with respiratory disease studied by Boonyaprapa et al (1980). None of the 13 patients studied by Levin et al (1993) had a positive scan, whereas 5% of the children with gastro-oesophageal reflux, 20% of the children with apparent life-threatening events, and 23% of the children with recurrent respiratory events studied by McVeagh et al (1987) had a positive scan.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The studies that report more than three participants describe an incidence of aspiration between 26 and 70% (Huxley et al 1978, Heyman and Respondek 1989, Levin et al 1993, BarSever et al 1995. The report of 70% positive studies was by Huxley et al (1978); it used a different method, with the instillation of radiopharmaceutical during sleep, and in volumes in excess of those that would be produced from normal saliva production.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Though it has been reported that the salivagram is a sensitive test for salivary aspiration, there was only 26-28% prevalence of positive salivagrams in children suspected of aspiration seen in three retrospective studies. [25][26][27] Future studies are needed to compare the salivagram to BAL amylase in diagnosing aspiration of oral secretions.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three retrospective reports [67][68][69] have shown a 26-28% prevalence of positive salivagrams in children suspected of aspiration, but no other confirmatory tests were performed. In one study evaluating the ability of salivagrams to predict the need for laryngotracheal separation, no correlation was found between salivagram result and days hospitalised owing to respiratory symptoms [70].…”
Section: Diagnosis Of Salivary Aspirationmentioning
confidence: 99%