Using the Principles of BIO2010 to Develop an Introductory, Interdisciplinary Course for Biology Students

Abstract

Modern biological sciences require practitioners to have increasing levels of knowledge, competence, and skills in mathematics and programming. A recent review of the science curriculum at the University of Queensland, a large, research-intensive institution in Australia, resulted in the development of a more quantitatively rigorous undergraduate program. Inspired by the National Research Council's BIO2010 report, a new interdisciplinary first-year course (SCIE1000) was created, incorporating mathematics and computer programming in the context of modern science. In this study, the perceptions of biological science students enrolled in SCIE1000 in 2008 and 2009 are measured. Analysis indicates that, as a result of taking SCIE1000, biological science students gained a positive appreciation of the importance of mathematics in their discipline. However, the data revealed that SCIE1000 did not contribute positively to gains in appreciation for computing and only slightly influenced students' motivation to enroll in upper-level quantitative-based courses. Further comparisons between 2008 and 2009 demonstrated the positive effect of using genuine, real-world contexts to enhance student perceptions toward the relevance of mathematics. The results support the recommendation from BIO2010 that mathematics should be introduced to biology students in first-year courses using real-world examples, while challenging the benefits of introducing programming in first-year courses.

Integrative Biological Chemistry Program Includes The Use Of Informatics Tools, GIS And SAS Software Applications

“…In response new undergraduate curricular materials have been developed and implemented (Rylands et al, 2013; Jungck et al, 2010; Matthews et al, 2010; Pursell, 2009; Owen and Breyer, 2005; Steen, 2005; Slonczewski and Marusak, 2004). …”

Biological Inquiry: A New Course and Assessment Plan in Response to the Call to Transform Undergraduate Biology

“…There is growing evidence that the calls for reform are paying dividends, as evidenced by stories of new courses that embrace best practices (Herron, 2009; Mathews et al , 2010) and reports of effective methods of assessing higher-order skills, such as scientific reasoning (Timmerman et al , 2010) and critical thinking (Bissell and Lemons, 2006). Several organizations of practitioners, including Science Education for New Civic Engagements and Responsibilities at (SENCER), Project Kaleidoscope (PKAL), Science Education Resource Center (SERC), Engineering Projects in Community (EPICS), and the BioQUEST Curriculum Consortium, are dedicated to sharing best practices, developing faculty skills, and motivating and guiding curriculum reform, and these groups and others have informed our work at Wofford College.…”

Using student feedback to improve student attitudes and mathematical confidence in a first year interdisciplinary quantitative course: from the ashes of disaster!

“…In response to calls by national science interest groups [11], universities in developed economies sought to enhance the quantitative skills of graduating students. With few exceptions, institutions typically responded by introducing free-standing, semester-long courses [12].…”

“…With few exceptions, institutions typically responded by introducing free-standing, semester-long courses [12]. These courses ranged from first year, introductory, interdisciplinary courses taught in large classes [13,11,9] to advanced level courses taught to a small group of academically high achieving students interested in quantitative problem solving [14], often in specialist fields [15]. Only rarely did these interdisciplinary quantitative skills courses form a compulsory part of an undergraduate student's degree program.…”