2002
DOI: 10.1901/jaba.2002.35-213
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using the Picture Exchange Communication System (Pecs) With Children With Autism: Assessment of Pecs Acquisition, Speech, Social‐communicative Behavior, and Problem Behavior

Abstract: The picture exchange communication system (PECS) is an augmentative communication system frequently used with children with autism (Bondy & Frost, 1994; Siegel, 2000; Yamall, 2000). Despite its common clinical use, no well-controlled empirical investigations have been conducted to test the effectiveness of PECS. Using a multiple baseline design, the present study examined the acquisition of PECS with 3 children with autism. In addition, the study examined the effects of PECS training on the emergence of speech… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

27
296
4
11

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 432 publications
(352 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
27
296
4
11
Order By: Relevance
“…The following issues were taken into account in the design of these interviews: (1) participants must fully understand what taking part in a study means, (2) the participants themselves must provide active consent, and (3) the study design must include techniques and methods which reflect the students' mental ages, to facilitate optimal conversation and student engagement (Charlop-Christy et al 2002;Kirk 2007;Kortesluoma, Hentinen, and Nikkonen 2003;Messiou 2012;Rose and Asher 2004).…”
Section: Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The following issues were taken into account in the design of these interviews: (1) participants must fully understand what taking part in a study means, (2) the participants themselves must provide active consent, and (3) the study design must include techniques and methods which reflect the students' mental ages, to facilitate optimal conversation and student engagement (Charlop-Christy et al 2002;Kirk 2007;Kortesluoma, Hentinen, and Nikkonen 2003;Messiou 2012;Rose and Asher 2004).…”
Section: Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The participants were then invited to discuss their own experiences. To make the scenarios more comprehensive for students with indications of attention difficulties or autism spectrum disorder, we used drawings to support the hypothetical scenario (Charlop-Christy et al 2002). Another reason to use supporting drawings is that drawings can stimulate the recollection of an experience (Salmon 2001).…”
Section: Instrumentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have seen in previous work that video can be a powerful tool for enabling caregiver communication and collaboration [17,19]. Additionally, pictures can support and enable new forms of communication between non-verbal children and their caregivers directly, based on evidence that non-verbal children can and do communicate via pictures already [8]. In these interventions, picture-based communication is enabled through heavyweight manual processes that often do not emulate ''real life'' images but instead use cartoons and other abstracted images, such as those supported by the Mocotos and vSked prototypes.…”
Section: Sensecam: Automatic Recording Of Everyday Imagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For Annie, the trend for spontaneous requesting levels only accelerated during naturalistic training after she received additional instruction to label the preferred items. These results tie into a growing body of literature that suggests that training staff to arrange the environment to present multiple opportunities to vocally request can directly impact this critical communication skill in children with autism (Charlop-Christy, Carpenter, LeBlanc, & Kellet, 2002;Goldstein, 2002;Jones, Feeley, & Takacs, 2007;Taylor & Harris, 1995). Before the onset of this study, the staff participants had been provided with training to use these procedures in the children's cubicles in self-contained special education classrooms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%