2019
DOI: 10.1101/589275
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using the past to estimate sensory uncertainty

Abstract: To form the most reliable percept of the environment, the brain needs to represent sensory uncertainty. Current theories of perceptual inference assume that the brain computes sensory uncertainty instantaneously and independently for each stimulus.In a series of psychophysics experiments human observers localized auditory signals that were presented in synchrony with spatially disparate visual signals. Critically, the visual noise changed dynamically over time with or without intermittent jumps. Our results sh… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(38 reference statements)
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This regularity of the sensory environment may hence involve frontal regions that exploit this regularity on longer times beyond the more immediate aftereffect arising from parietal regions. Such a divided role of parietal and frontal regions in contributing to multisensory recalibration is in line with the notion that parietal regions contribute to the fusion of multisensory information within a trial, while frontal regions are also engaged in the causal inference of whether different stimuli likely arise from a common source (Cao et al 2019;Rohe et al 2019;Rohe and Noppeney 2015).Such an inference process benefits from knowledge about the recent stimulus history (Beierholm et al 2019). It remains to be understood whether the same or distinct frontal regions contribute to causal inference within a trial and the fostering of recalibration based on the cumulative stimulus history.…”
Section: Multiple Timescales Of the Ventriloquism Aftereffectsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…This regularity of the sensory environment may hence involve frontal regions that exploit this regularity on longer times beyond the more immediate aftereffect arising from parietal regions. Such a divided role of parietal and frontal regions in contributing to multisensory recalibration is in line with the notion that parietal regions contribute to the fusion of multisensory information within a trial, while frontal regions are also engaged in the causal inference of whether different stimuli likely arise from a common source (Cao et al 2019;Rohe et al 2019;Rohe and Noppeney 2015).Such an inference process benefits from knowledge about the recent stimulus history (Beierholm et al 2019). It remains to be understood whether the same or distinct frontal regions contribute to causal inference within a trial and the fostering of recalibration based on the cumulative stimulus history.…”
Section: Multiple Timescales Of the Ventriloquism Aftereffectsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…One possibility is that parietal regions guide the aftereffect based on the more immediate stimulus history, while frontal processes exploit the regularity over longer time scales. Such a divided role fits with the notion that parietal regions contribute to the immediate fusion of multisensory information within a trial, while frontal regions help differentiating whether two stimuli arise from a common source (Cao et al, 2019;Rohe et al, 2019;Rohe & Noppeney, 2015), a process known to benefit from knowledge about stimulus history (Beierholm et al, 2019). Future work should investigate whether the same or distinct frontal regions contribute to causal inference within a trial and the fostering of recalibration based on the cumulative stimulus history.…”
Section: Multiple Timescales Of the Ventriloquism Aftereffectmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…In recent years advances in signal analysis have led to a revision of the notion of unimodal primary areas suggesting that the neocortex might essentially be multisensory in function (Cappe and Barone, 2005; Fu et al, 2003; Gau et al, 2020; Ghazanfar and Schroeder, 2006; Hasson et al, 2016; Henschke et al, 2015; Liang et al, 2013; Macaluso and Driver, 2005; Murray et al, 2016). The major focus on the projection of non-visual areas to early visual cortex in the primate brain has been on those originating from auditory cortex which in addition to multisensory integration and their impact on perception (Bedny, 2017; Deen et al, 2015; Kanjlia et al, 2021; Kupers and Ptito, 2014; van Wassenhove et al, 2005), have been implicated in cortical plasticity and cross modal reorganization (Gau et al, 2020; Vetter et al, 2020) and as a model system for investigating predictive processing in the cortex (Beierholm et al, 2020; Gau et al, 2020; Rohe et al, 2019; Rohe and Noppeney, 2015; Vetter et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%