2002
DOI: 10.1301/002966402320387189
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using the New Dietary Reference Intakes to Assess Diets: A Map to the Maze

Abstract: New Dietary Reference Intakes (DRIs) are being set by the Institute of Medicine, and represent a new way of defining nutrient intake recommendations. For the first time, the recommendations for the United States and Canada allow the calculation of the probability of adequacy for an individual, and the prevalence of inadequacy for a population. In addition, possible excessive consumption of many nutrients can be evaluated. The goal of this review is to provide a practical guide to the proper uses of the new DRI… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
43
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The EARs are based upon risks of deficiency and, for some nutrients, chronic disease prevention 23 . The methods have been described elsewhere 12,16,17,24,25 . Major assumptions of this method include:…”
Section: The Ear Cut-point Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EARs are based upon risks of deficiency and, for some nutrients, chronic disease prevention 23 . The methods have been described elsewhere 12,16,17,24,25 . Major assumptions of this method include:…”
Section: The Ear Cut-point Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evaluating nutrient intakes from both food and supplements would reflect in a more realistic way the adequacy with respect to recommendations (22) .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is now argued that the use of RDA to measure population prevalence is likely to overstate the number of malnourished, as the RDA is defined to be the level at which there is 97.5 per cent probability that an individual's nutrient requirements are met. Instead, the use of estimated energy requirement (EER) is recommended; this is typically 20 per cent lower than the RDA (see Barr et al 2003 andPoos 2002).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%