2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnc.2011.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using the natural capital index framework as a scalable aggregation methodology for regional biodiversity indicators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The method was adopted for national conditions from the system of Grime (1979). Furthermore, a new possibility is the application of the Natural Capital Index (NCI), which reflects the qualitative and quantitative (spatial) characteristics of the natural or semi-natural vegetation (Czúcz et al, 2012;ten Brink, 2000ten Brink, , 2007ten Brink et al, 2002). Both indicators use vegetation data of field surveys, and the main difference is that SBT values are determined at the level of quadrats on a large scale, whereas the NCI is determined on a regional scale for almost the entire country.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The method was adopted for national conditions from the system of Grime (1979). Furthermore, a new possibility is the application of the Natural Capital Index (NCI), which reflects the qualitative and quantitative (spatial) characteristics of the natural or semi-natural vegetation (Czúcz et al, 2012;ten Brink, 2000ten Brink, , 2007ten Brink et al, 2002). Both indicators use vegetation data of field surveys, and the main difference is that SBT values are determined at the level of quadrats on a large scale, whereas the NCI is determined on a regional scale for almost the entire country.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NCI values of 5.5 × 6.5 km FMU quadrate areas of Hungary based on botanical field survey between 2003 and 2006. Source:Czúcz et al, 2012. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NCI, for example, is not suitable for handling local peak values and cannot express the large-scale naturalness of the landscape (Czúcz et al, 2012). This limitation can be partly eliminated by using bird indicators.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HQ and HD could be evaluated from several aspects [89,90]. For example, it could be estimated by comparing field survey data on habitat conditions to ex-ante standardized criteria or by using calibrated models to estimate HQ and HD from the perspective of the spatial relationship among species, threats, and ecosystem types.…”
Section: Feasibility Of the Cea Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%