Using the Multi-Ethnic Group Measure as an Indicator of Malaysian Ethnic Identities

Abstract

Understanding ethnic identity has gained increasing theoretical, empirical, and practical salience in Malaysia due to developments in economics, national desires and social structure of society. (Tajfel & Turner, 1986 Social psychologists' interest in identity is centred on feelings of belonging to a group and the consequences of identification with one's social groups in society

Need for closure and ethnic identification: The varied roles of cultural intelligence in a multiethnic group society

“…Olonisakin (2019) found positive correlations between MEIM and measures of xenophobia and ethnocentrism with a Nigerian sample. Also, Granhemat et al (2014) reported a Cronbach's α of 0.86 while Nijboer (2011) reported a Cronbach's α of 0.82. Cronbach's α for the MEIM scale in the current study was 0.88.…”

“…High scores on the scale indicate more identification with the group. This scale is a valid measure of ethnic identity across different ethnic groups (Fisher et al, 2020;Granhemat et al, 2014;Nijboer, 2011;Roberts et al, 1999). Olonisakin (2019) Earley and Mosakowski (2004).…”

Research Paper in Literature of Increasing Thickness by Inclined Target

“…High shaft thickness, influence speed, and length-to-expansiveness extent are parts that add to a high essential rebound edge (the time when rebound is depended upon to onset) for a long post shot [49][50][51][52][53][54][55]; however, remarkable formulae may foresee particular fundamental rebound plots for the comparable condition.…”