2017
DOI: 10.1111/jhn.12497
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using the method of triads in the validation of a food frequency questionnaire to assess the consumption of fatty acids in adults

Abstract: Using the method of triads in the validation of a food frequency questionnaire to assess the consumption of fatty acids in adults. J Hum Nutr Diet. 31, 85-95 https://doi.org/10.1111/jhn.12497 AbstractBackground: It is of great value to develop valid instruments to estimate food consumption; for this purpose, the triads method has been applied in validation studies of dietary intake to evaluate the correlation between three measurements [food frequency questionnaire (FFQ), reference method and biomarker]. The m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
5
2
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
5
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in line with our findings for LA when using the 24hR as reference method. A recent study in Brazilian adults, also using the method of triads with a biomarker, FFQ and 24hR, reported validity coefficients for the FFQ for SFA (0·28) and LA (0·31) which are lower than our results ( 24 ) . Although differences in the statistical method to assess validity coefficients, adjustment for different covariates, study population, validity of the FCD and characteristics of the FFQ may hamper comparability of studies, our findings were in the same order of magnitude as the results previously published.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…This is in line with our findings for LA when using the 24hR as reference method. A recent study in Brazilian adults, also using the method of triads with a biomarker, FFQ and 24hR, reported validity coefficients for the FFQ for SFA (0·28) and LA (0·31) which are lower than our results ( 24 ) . Although differences in the statistical method to assess validity coefficients, adjustment for different covariates, study population, validity of the FCD and characteristics of the FFQ may hamper comparability of studies, our findings were in the same order of magnitude as the results previously published.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the median intakes did not differ significantly between the two methods for any of the PUFAs reported. It was reported previously that in general FFQs tend to overestimate dietary intake compared to other methods such as repeated 24-h recalls or food records [21,22,23]. In our current study, the differences were not significant.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 66%
“…The ‘method of triads’ statistical model was used to derive a validity coefficient to estimate the relationship between a dietary measurement (e.g., the CODS) and an estimated “true” intake (Figure S2) [42,43]. Validity coefficients closer to 1 indicated a closer relationship between the estimated dietary score and the estimated “true” intake [27].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%