2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2008.02041.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using the Mahalanobis distance statistic with unplanned presence‐only survey data for biogeographical models of species distribution and abundance: a case study of badger setts

Abstract: Aim Project-specific data for biogeographical models are often logistically impractical to collect, forcing the use of existing data from a variety of sources. Use of these data is complicated when neither absence nor an estimate of the area sampled is available, as these are requirements of most analytical techniques. We demonstrate the Mahalanobis distance statistic (D 2 ), which is a presence-only modelling technique and does not require information on species absence or the sampled area. We use badger (Mel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
37
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(48 reference statements)
3
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our technique is also based on a non-parametric test that does not require the multinormality of ecogeographical variables. Although the use of the Generalised Mahalanobis distance is not new in this kind of model (Farber & Kadmon 2003, Cayuela 2004, Etherington et al 2009), this is the first time that this distance metric has been embedded into a non-parametric test. For example, Cayuela (2004) rescaled the Mahalanobis distance into quantiles to produce a map of probability, and Nogués-Bravo et al (2008) converted the distance into quartiles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Our technique is also based on a non-parametric test that does not require the multinormality of ecogeographical variables. Although the use of the Generalised Mahalanobis distance is not new in this kind of model (Farber & Kadmon 2003, Cayuela 2004, Etherington et al 2009), this is the first time that this distance metric has been embedded into a non-parametric test. For example, Cayuela (2004) rescaled the Mahalanobis distance into quantiles to produce a map of probability, and Nogués-Bravo et al (2008) converted the distance into quartiles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This procedure has been widely used in spatial ecology (e.g. [51], [52]). The same predictors selected by ENFA were used to obtain MD.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We measure this by computing the Spearman's Correlation Coefficient (Etherington et al, 2009) where values closer to 1 indicate a better fit; typically value above 0.7 are considered to show a strong correlation. An RSF plot describes the relationship between classified suitability scores from predictions (in our case we chose to apply a quantile classification with 20 classes) and area-adjusted observation frequency (number of positive observations corresponding to a suitability class divided by the number of cells in the landscape with that class).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%