2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology 2010
DOI: 10.1109/iembs.2010.5626125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using the Lomb periodogram for non-contact estimation of respiration rates

Abstract: We describe a contact-less method for measurement of respiration rate during sleep using a 5.8GHz radio-frequency bio-motion sensor. The sensor operates by sensing phase shifts in reflected radio waves from the torso caused by respiratory movements and other bodily movements such as twitches, positional changes etc. These non-respiratory motion artefacts can obscure reliable estimation of breathinig rates if conventional spectral analysis is used. This paper reports on the accuracy of the respiration rate esti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In using Lomb-Scargle Periodogram, the corrupted signals, which are often caused by intermittent movements or motion artefacts, can be excluded by treating those portions as missing data segments. Results have demonstrated that the Lomb-Scargle Periodogram has been successfully used on evenly sampled data, with periods of missing data, to achieve an average error of less than 0.4 breath per minute and standard deviation of 0.3 breath per minute for respiratory rate estimation [90].…”
Section: Numerical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In using Lomb-Scargle Periodogram, the corrupted signals, which are often caused by intermittent movements or motion artefacts, can be excluded by treating those portions as missing data segments. Results have demonstrated that the Lomb-Scargle Periodogram has been successfully used on evenly sampled data, with periods of missing data, to achieve an average error of less than 0.4 breath per minute and standard deviation of 0.3 breath per minute for respiratory rate estimation [90].…”
Section: Numerical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternative less obtrusive solutions were proposed in the past. See [5][6][7][8][9] for examples making use of inductive coupling [5], capacitive sensors [6], motion detectors [7], Doppler radar [8] and high-frequency reflections [9]. See [10] as well for a commercial product performing RR measurements by analysing the airflow sound using a sticker attached to the neck.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Doppler sensor modalities, including radio frequency transmitters/receivers [83][84][85][86][87][88] and ultrasound sensors [63,89,90], are placed with a line of sight to the subject so that reflected waves capture bodily motion. Audiovisual systems use video [91][92][93], or microphones [74].…”
Section: Sensor Modalitymentioning
confidence: 99%