“…However, the KWM proved to be very effective even without the emphasis on the interactive imagery, as long as certain criteria were considered in the selection of the two words. These criteria include, a high degree of phonemic overlapping, a high imagery value, and a high concreteness value (Dolean, 2014). Although the efficiency of the KWM is generally recognized by most scholars, some critics indicate that the method is less efficient than traditional learning methods when it is used by experienced foreign language learners or older students (Hogben & Lawson, 1994;Van Hell & Mahn, 1997;Wei, 2015).…”