2022
DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac6021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using the Hills Mechanism to Generate Repeating Partial Tidal Disruption Events and ASASSN-14ko

Abstract: Periodic nuclear transients have been detected with increasing frequency, with one such system—ASASSN-14ko—exhibiting highly regular outbursts on a timescale of 114 ± 1 days. It has been postulated that the outbursts from this source are generated by the repeated partial disruption of a star, but how the star was placed onto such a tightly bound orbit about the supermassive black hole remains unclear. Here we use analytic arguments and three-body integrations to demonstrate that the Hills mechanism, where a bi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is not clear that these would constitute TDEs that yield detectable emission, as it seems likely that such stars would be progressively stripped of their mass over many pericenter passages, leading to underluminous events spread out over long (humanly inaccessible) timescales (as suggested by MacLeod et al 2012); this is especially true at the high SMBH mass where the fallback time of the material becomes  years. It is also not possible to substantially reduce the orbital period of such starts through traditional tidal dissipation owing to the extreme mass ratio (Cufari et al 2022). Therefore, we expect the rate suppression derived here to be substantial, even with the empty loss-cone regime included, though we leave a detailed investigation of the importance of the latter regime to future work.…”
Section: The Definition Of R T and "Observable" Tdesmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…However, it is not clear that these would constitute TDEs that yield detectable emission, as it seems likely that such stars would be progressively stripped of their mass over many pericenter passages, leading to underluminous events spread out over long (humanly inaccessible) timescales (as suggested by MacLeod et al 2012); this is especially true at the high SMBH mass where the fallback time of the material becomes  years. It is also not possible to substantially reduce the orbital period of such starts through traditional tidal dissipation owing to the extreme mass ratio (Cufari et al 2022). Therefore, we expect the rate suppression derived here to be substantial, even with the empty loss-cone regime included, though we leave a detailed investigation of the importance of the latter regime to future work.…”
Section: The Definition Of R T and "Observable" Tdesmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…I thank the authors of Cufari et al (2022) for sending me a copy of their paper in advance of publication. I am particularly grateful to the anonymous referee for a very thoughtful and perceptive report.…”
Section: Acknowledgmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These arguments suggest that the star that initially fueled the outburst from AT2018fyk was partially disrupted (see also Coughlin & Nixon 2022b). Typically tidally disrupted stars are on approximately parabolic orbits (e.g., Merritt 2013), which begs the question of how a partial TDE could yield a rebrighten-ing because, as noted by Cufari et al (2022a), tidal dissipation within the partially disrupted star yields a minimum orbital period of a few ×10 3 years for a 10 7.7 M SMBH (see their Equation 1). One can bind the partially disrupted star more tightly if the star was initially part of a binary system that was destroyed through Hills capture (Hills 1988).…”
Section: Explaining the Rebrightening: A Repeating Partial Tidal Disr...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Setting M = 10 7.7 M and taking solar-like values gives T acc 0.8 yr and L acc 6.7×10 44 erg s −1 (Figure 3, panel b). Partial TDEs typically rise, peak, and decay as ∝ t −9/4 Miles et al 2020;Nixon et al 2021), but for a star on a bound orbit, the fallback rate plummets as the star returns to pericenter (Hayasaki et al 2013b;Darbha et al 2018;Cufari et al 2022a). The reason for this sharp decline in the fallback rate is that the stellar core has a Hill sphere -an approximately spherical region within which the star's gravitational field dominates over that of the SMBHnear to which the stream density is much smaller than that of the bulk of the stream (Figure 3, panel e).…”
Section: Explaining the Rebrightening: A Repeating Partial Tidal Disr...mentioning
confidence: 99%