Using the Constitutionality Framework to Understand Alliances, Collective Action, and Divisions Between Indigenous and Peasant Communities in the Chaco Salteño

Abstract

This article analyzes bottom-up institution-building processes in a region considered deforestation and environmental degradation hotspot. Utilizing the constitutionality approach developed by Haller, Acciaioli, and Rist (2016), we examine two recent cases of bottom-up institution-building in the department of Rivadavia, Chaco Salteño, Argentina. We highlight the similarities and differences between both constitutionality processes and identify various weaknesses in the two cases. We argue that constitutionality, understood as a process, has occurred to different (incomplete) degrees in each case. Finally, we show that external catalyzing agents play a decisive role in enabling or hampering the constitutionality process. Our study contributes to the literature on common-pool resource governance by highlighting how collective action can lead to participatory-development processes.

Factors influencing the effectiveness of collective action for the sustainability of the local commons: Toward an integrated framework

“…Moreover, several studies on the commons have highlighted the deliberative collaboration process as another signi cant factor for an effective CASLC (Tschopp et al, 2022;Wiederkehr et al, 2019). The deliberative process refers to effective communication among various stakeholders wherein they engage in discussions, raise their own ideas and consider those of others, exchange observations and perspectives, re ect on shared information, and carefully assess outcomes (Newig et al, 2017).…”