2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2005.01396.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using the chicken genome sequence in the development and mapping of genetic markers in the turkey (Meleagris gallopavo)

Abstract: The efficacy of employing the chicken genome sequence in developing genetic markers and in mapping the turkey genome was studied. Eighty previously uncharacterized microsatellite markers were identified for the turkey using BLAST alignment to the chicken genome. The chicken sequence was then used to develop primers for polymerase chain reaction where the turkey sequence was either unavailable or insufficient. A total of 78 primer sets were tested for amplification and polymorphism in the turkey, and informativ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although separated by approximately 40 million years of evolution (Romanov and Dodgson, 2006), numerous studies have described the highly homologous and syntenic relationship between the turkey and chicken genomes (Reed et al, 2003(Reed et al, , 2005Axelsson et al, 2005;Chaves et al, 2006). Chicken DNA sequences were successfully utilized in the design of primers for amplification of turkey MHC regions indicating further homology between the species, even in the most polymorphic and positively selected region of the genome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although separated by approximately 40 million years of evolution (Romanov and Dodgson, 2006), numerous studies have described the highly homologous and syntenic relationship between the turkey and chicken genomes (Reed et al, 2003(Reed et al, , 2005Axelsson et al, 2005;Chaves et al, 2006). Chicken DNA sequences were successfully utilized in the design of primers for amplification of turkey MHC regions indicating further homology between the species, even in the most polymorphic and positively selected region of the genome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microsatellite markers included those developed at the University of Minnesota (MNT; Reed et al, 2005 and references therein; Chaves et al, 2006), Roslin Institute (RHT; Burt et al, 2003), Tuskegee University (TUM; Huang et al, 1999) and Purdue University (WT; Latch et al, 2002). In addition, 70 markers developed for chicken (ADL, LEI, ROS and UMA) and quail (GUJ) and 42 unpublished turkey markers (MTW; Wageningen University, courtesy of Richard Crooijmans), MGP (Agricultural Biotechnology Hungary, courtesy of Laslo Varga) and MNT (University of Minnesota, KM Reed) were also included.…”
Section: Genetic Markersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We assembled the reads into genomic contigs to extract SSR sequences. The utilization of NGS technology delivers more coverage than the conventional whole-genome sequencing approach (24). This coverage includes more SSR markers, as recorded in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Putative camel homologs were found on each chromosome of bovine genome, except for BTA 25, 28, and Y. One camel SSR locus was placed on BTA 6,7,8,12,16,19,24, and 26, while BTA 11 and 14 reached 5 SSRs each with an average of 2 loci per chromosome. Conversely, 3 markers showed matches to unassigned contigs (UN).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%