The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00710-016-0440-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using the chemical analysis of magnetite to constrain various stages in the formation and genesis of the Kiruna-type chadormalu magnetite-apatite deposit, Bafq district, Central Iran

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alteration and remobilization features comparable to those in apatite has recently been documented through SEM and EPMA studies on different magnetite types from the Chadormalu deposit [22]. Primary magnetite (Mag 1) formed initially from magmatic hydrothermal fluids was enriched in Si, Al, and Ca, whereas secondary magnetite (Mag 2) with higher Fe and lower Si, Al, and Ca contents were generated through interaction of the primary ore with infiltrating fluids of non-magmatic origin.…”
Section: Comparison With Magnetite Alterationmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Alteration and remobilization features comparable to those in apatite has recently been documented through SEM and EPMA studies on different magnetite types from the Chadormalu deposit [22]. Primary magnetite (Mag 1) formed initially from magmatic hydrothermal fluids was enriched in Si, Al, and Ca, whereas secondary magnetite (Mag 2) with higher Fe and lower Si, Al, and Ca contents were generated through interaction of the primary ore with infiltrating fluids of non-magmatic origin.…”
Section: Comparison With Magnetite Alterationmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The average compositions of "impure" elements in the two samples (C-4, S-2) are plotted in the discriminant diagrams of Al + Mn vs. Ti + V, Ca + Al + Mn vs. Ti + V, and Ni/(Cr + Mn) vs. Ti + V (Figure 7), published by Dupuis and Beaudoin [1], in order to compare with data of silician magnetite from other types of Fe deposits [17][18][19][20]. The mean value of the fairly homogeneous C-4 sample plots within the IOCG field; however, that of the zoned S-2 sample plots in the skarn field.…”
Section: Epmamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This implies that the Copiapó Nordeste silician magnetite has a chemical characteristic between IOCG-and skarntypes. [4], El Laco (purple) [19], Chadormalu Si-rich magnetite (orange) [20], Chadormalu Si-poor magnetite (yellow) [20], and Chengchao (green) [17]. Modified from Dupuis and Beaudoin [1] and Nadoll et al [3].…”
Section: Epmamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the presence of cations with variable valence states (e.g., FeO vs. Fe 2 O 3 vs. Fe 3 O 4 ; MnO vs. Mn 3 O 4 ) may complicate the determination of stoichiometric oxygen and significantly affect matrix corrections, as the above cations are assigned a fixed oxidation state (e.g., Fe 2+ for FeO, Fe 2 O 3 and Fe 3 O 4 , and Mn 2+ for both MnO and Mn 3 O 4 ), for example Fe oxides have been extensively described as FeO (e.g., Heidarian et al . , Ivanyuk et al . , Tan et al .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this method, the content of oxygen was calculated by defining the valences of cations in EPMA software, which is useful for analysing oxides where the identities and oxidation states of all cations and anions are known. However, the presence of cations with variable valence states (e.g., FeO vs. Fe 2 O 3 vs. Fe 3 O 4 ; MnO vs. Mn 3 O 4 ) may complicate the determination of stoichiometric oxygen and significantly affect matrix corrections, as the above cations are assigned a fixed oxidation state (e.g., Fe 2+ for FeO, Fe 2 O 3 and Fe 3 O 4 , and Mn 2+ for both MnO and Mn 3 O 4 ), for example Fe oxides have been extensively described as FeO (e.g., Heidarian et al 2016, Ivanyuk et al 2016, Tan et al 2016, Velasco et al 2016, Uenver-Thiele et al 2017, Yin et al 2017, and Mn oxides have been extensively described as MnO (e.g., Gnos andPeters 1995, Bosi et al 2010). Besides, the valence of Fe cation in some solid-solution series of haematite and magnetite is various and cannot be defined before analysis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%