2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00445-020-01422-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using the characteristics of rootless cone deposits to estimate the energetics of explosive lava–water interactions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Red symbols in Figure 12 show the High-Λ scenario, where the particle roughness scale Λ is increased from 10 to 25 and other input parameters are held constant. Similar to Fitch and Fagents (2020), Λ has the largest influence on total ash surface area. Increasing Λ to 25 results in a proportional increase in initial surface area; the minimum value of S for the Reference scenario with no entrained external water is 860 m 2 /kg, and is 2160 m 2 /kg for the High-Λ scenario.…”
Section: Roughness and Fragmentation Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Red symbols in Figure 12 show the High-Λ scenario, where the particle roughness scale Λ is increased from 10 to 25 and other input parameters are held constant. Similar to Fitch and Fagents (2020), Λ has the largest influence on total ash surface area. Increasing Λ to 25 results in a proportional increase in initial surface area; the minimum value of S for the Reference scenario with no entrained external water is 860 m 2 /kg, and is 2160 m 2 /kg for the High-Λ scenario.…”
Section: Roughness and Fragmentation Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 91%
“…How to capture thoroughly these particle-scale effects and their consequences for the mean particle size distribution in an evolving volcanic jet mixture is unclear and remains a subject of vigorous research (e.g. Wohletz, 1983;Büttner et al, 2002Büttner et al, , 2006Mastin, 2007a;Woodcock et al, 2012;Patel et al, 2013;Liu et al, 2015;van Otterloo et al, 2015;Fitch and Fagents, 2020;Dürig et al, 2020b;Moitra et al, 2020). However, with a specified magmatic heat flow at the vent, considerations of the surface energy consumed to generate fine ash fragments (Sonder et al, 2011), guided by published experiments along with observational constraints on the hydromagmatic evolution of particle sizes (Costa et al, 2016), provide a way forward that is appropriate for a 1D integral model.…”
Section: Quench Fragmentation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…How to capture thoroughly these particle-scale effects and their consequences for the mean particle size distribution in an evolving volcanic jet mixture is unclear and remains a subject of vigorous research (e.g., Wohletz, 1983;Büttner et al, 2002Büttner et al, , 2006Mastin, 2007a;Woodcock et al, 2012;Patel et al, 2013;Liu et al, 2015;van Otterloo et al, 2015;Dürig et al, 2020b;Fitch and Fagents, 2020;Moitra et al, 2020;Hajimirza et al, 2022). However, with a specified magmatic heat flow at the vent, considerations of the surface energy consumed to generate fine ash fragments (Sonder et al, 2011), guided by published experiments along with observational constraints on the hydromagmatic evolution of particle sizes (Costa et al, 2016), provide a way forward that is appropriate for a 1D integral model.…”
Section: Quench Fragmentation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%