2016
DOI: 10.1039/c5cp05299h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using the C–O stretch to unravel the nature of hydrogen bonding in low-temperature solid methanol–water condensates

Abstract: The C–O stretch of CH3OH is highly sensitive to the interaction between CH3OH and H2O showing a progressive change in profile as a function of CH3OH/H2O mixing ratio, R.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
37
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(116 reference statements)
5
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is also an observed redshift in the position of the water bending mode with increasing benzene concentration. Since strong hydrogen bonding is associated with a blueshift in the n 2 bending mode of H 2 O, 21 the observed redshift with respect to pure amorphous solid water confirms that the strength of benzene-water interaction is weaker than that of the water-water hydrogen bonding interaction 24 and is a result of benzene molecules disrupting the water hydrogen bonding network. This is in agreement with results from the VUV spectra (Section 3.1.1) and temperature programmed desorption results of Thrower et al 28 The influence of dilution of benzene in water on the IR bands of benzene is small, resulting only in slight blueshifts in the bands (see Table 2) relative to pure benzene and no visible broadening.…”
Section: Pccp Papermentioning
confidence: 73%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There is also an observed redshift in the position of the water bending mode with increasing benzene concentration. Since strong hydrogen bonding is associated with a blueshift in the n 2 bending mode of H 2 O, 21 the observed redshift with respect to pure amorphous solid water confirms that the strength of benzene-water interaction is weaker than that of the water-water hydrogen bonding interaction 24 and is a result of benzene molecules disrupting the water hydrogen bonding network. This is in agreement with results from the VUV spectra (Section 3.1.1) and temperature programmed desorption results of Thrower et al 28 The influence of dilution of benzene in water on the IR bands of benzene is small, resulting only in slight blueshifts in the bands (see Table 2) relative to pure benzene and no visible broadening.…”
Section: Pccp Papermentioning
confidence: 73%
“…We calculated the cross sections of benzene for different concentrations of benzene and water ice mixtures. These values may suffer from errors of up to 20%, not unlike the infrared integrated absorption coefficients, or A-values, for molecular vibrational bands which suffer form uncertainties of up to 30% 21 in the values quoted in the literature. Nevertheless, the results show a significant enhancement of the peak cross section intensity at lower concentrations, tending towards gas phase cross sections of benzene, with a peak gas phase cross section of 270 Mb and 225 Mb, 150 Mb and 75 Mb for 1 : 100, 1 : 10 and 1 : 1 solid phase mixtures of benzene and water respectively, compared with 47 Mb for pure solid benzene.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The products formed in the H 2 CO + H + O 2 experiment are listed in Table 2 along with the corresponding IR signatures that are labeled in Figure 3. Note that the two peaks around 1000 cm −1 are within the frequency range of the C-O stretch of CH 3 OH (Dawes et al 2016). However, these peaks disappear between 195 and 205 K (not shown here), which is a temperature range that is higher than the desorption temperature of CH 3 OH or any species that are positively identified in this study.…”
Section: Formation Of Hcooh Ice By H 2 Co + H + Omentioning
confidence: 92%
“…required to calculate these parameters might not be available in some laboratories. In such cases, an analytical method using averaged values has been used [23,32] instead. In order to address the impact of approximated values in the Complex Refractive Index calculation, a statistical analysis was performed.…”
Section: Refractive Index In Infraredmentioning
confidence: 99%