2005
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti381
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using the biological taxonomy to access biological literature with PathBinderH

Abstract: www.plantgenomics.iastate.edu/PathBinderH. Source code and databases on request.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(We note that the main factor influencing processing time is the Java XML document parsing rather than the actual species name tagging.) These species tagging experiments far exceed the scale of any previous report [7,10,14,23,25,36,37,41], and represent one of the first applications of text mining to the entire PMC OA corpus (see also [15,54,55]). Over 30 million species tags for over 57,000 different species were detected in MEDLINE, and over 4 million species tags for nearly 19,000 species in PMC OA.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…(We note that the main factor influencing processing time is the Java XML document parsing rather than the actual species name tagging.) These species tagging experiments far exceed the scale of any previous report [7,10,14,23,25,36,37,41], and represent one of the first applications of text mining to the entire PMC OA corpus (see also [15,54,55]). Over 30 million species tags for over 57,000 different species were detected in MEDLINE, and over 4 million species tags for nearly 19,000 species in PMC OA.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…While a number of tools performing species name recognition and/or normalization of both scientific names and synonyms have been reported previously [7,10,14,23,25,33,36,37,41,61], the work presented here contributes to the field in a number of unique ways. These include availability of a robust, open-source, stand-alone application (other tools are either not publically available, only available as web services or not capable of recognizing common names), scale of species tagging (all of MEDLINE and PMC OA until 2008), depth and rigour of evaluation (other tools do not perform evaluation against normalized database identifiers, or are limited to a small sample of documents) and accuracy (compared to other available tools, LINNAEUS shows better performance, mainly due to better handling of ambiguous mentions and inclusion of additional synonyms).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Others references are input by curators. Our internal curator tool integrates with PathBinder [5,7] to allow searching PubMed and adding selected biological references.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%