Large‐Scale Inverse Problems and Quantification of Uncertainty 2010
DOI: 10.1002/9780470685853.ch5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using the Bayesian Framework to Combine Simulations and Physical Observations for Statistical Inference

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The statistical model did not account for systematic model bias. Our approach is consistent with the mathematical formulation of solving large scale inverse problems using computer models and observed data [see, e.g., the cosmic microwave background application in Higdon et al (2011)]. With only one observed geomagnetic storm, model bias is confounded with the residual process; with multiple storms we could potentially include a full bias term across space and time.…”
Section: Results and Sequential Designmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The statistical model did not account for systematic model bias. Our approach is consistent with the mathematical formulation of solving large scale inverse problems using computer models and observed data [see, e.g., the cosmic microwave background application in Higdon et al (2011)]. With only one observed geomagnetic storm, model bias is confounded with the residual process; with multiple storms we could potentially include a full bias term across space and time.…”
Section: Results and Sequential Designmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…n is assumed normally distributed about each mode with a single variance r 2 (i.e., n is the same for every mode) and represents the combined uncertainty in the model and the measurements. [38] While it is unlikely that the noise is actually the same for every mode, Section III-E-3 discusses a posteriori methods by which this and other assumptions are deemed acceptable. The formulation of Eq.…”
Section: Building a Statistical Rus Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5] means that the resonance modes produced by either the forward model or by measurement are themselves random variables. [16,38] Thus, a statement of the conditional probability of measuring a set of modes M from a specimen with a fixed set of parameters h may be written in terms of the forward model f as PðMjhÞ $ Nðf ðhÞ; rÞ; ½6…”
Section: Building a Statistical Rus Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%