2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2020.04.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using the American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System at the Point of Care: Sonographer Performance and Interobserver Variability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to the other sonographic criteria, shape and margin are scored either 0 or 3, and 0, 2, or 3, respectively. Differences in opinion with respect to shape and margin can certainly have a big impact on the overall TI-RADS score and, ultimately, whether a patient will need FNA or not [ 26 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to the other sonographic criteria, shape and margin are scored either 0 or 3, and 0, 2, or 3, respectively. Differences in opinion with respect to shape and margin can certainly have a big impact on the overall TI-RADS score and, ultimately, whether a patient will need FNA or not [ 26 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our findings also suggest the possibility of a future revision of the weights attributed to some ACR-TIRADS system features, with an eventual reduction in the scores associated with solid composition and hypoechogenicity (2 points each), whose impact on the screening process was not particularly relevant in this study ( Table 3 ). Moreover, future improvements in the algorithm might include alternative characteristics, such as elastography, that already demonstrated a potential impact in classification systems used for other organs and districts [ 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 ]. As per previous studies relying on the ACR-TIRADS class, FNA would be indicated in a range of 17% to 40%; in this paper, cases with FNA indicated by the ACR system accounted for 46.5% of the nodules, confirming its high “rule-out” role.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As our data indicate, it is worthwhile to perform proper measurements because even a minor modification of the threshold for nodule’s suspicious shape may lead to a several-fold change in SEN of that feature and marked changes in its SPC and RoM. The local experience of a center is especially valuable in this case, because the reproducibility of the assessment of nodule’s suspicious shape, like other US malignancy features, is not high [ 36 ]. It results not only from technical differences in measurements (e.g., caused by different positions of a patient, or different pressure exerted by a probe on the examined area), but also from differences in the epidemiology of thyroid diseases in examined patients (different incidence of HT, other profile of cancers).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%