2002
DOI: 10.1300/j111v36n01_07
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using the ACRL Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education to Assess a University Library Instruction Program

Abstract: The Reference and Instruction Department at Oregon State University (OSU) was charged with creating a vision and goals for its instruction program. This article describes how we used the recently published ACRL Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education as a framework for an initial self-study of our instructional practice and for promoting the concept of information literacy at our institution. The process of assessing our current practice led to discussions with library and campus faculty… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
(1 reference statement)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“… to define and measure students’ skills; to develop benchmarking statements and quality standards; to evidence achievement of intended learning outcomes; to improve future programmes; to support the professional development of library staff; to involve library staff in the same quality mechanisms as academic staff; to develop more strategic, client‐centred, outcomes‐based indicators of library success 8–11 …”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… to define and measure students’ skills; to develop benchmarking statements and quality standards; to evidence achievement of intended learning outcomes; to improve future programmes; to support the professional development of library staff; to involve library staff in the same quality mechanisms as academic staff; to develop more strategic, client‐centred, outcomes‐based indicators of library success 8–11 …”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• to define and measure students' skills; • to develop benchmarking statements and quality standards; • to evidence achievement of intended learning outcomes; • to improve future programmes; • to support the professional development of library staff; • to involve library staff in the same quality mechanisms as academic staff; • to develop more strategic, client-centred, outcomes-based indicators of library success. [8][9][10][11] The range of assessment and evaluation methods discussed includes both quantitative and qualitative approaches, for example: pre-tests and post-tests; recall and precision exercises; multiplechoice questions (MCQs); skills checklists; satisfaction questionnaires; focus groups; interviews; self-assessments; longitudinal surveys, including surveys of graduates and their employers; observation; and examination of completed work, such as (annotated) bibliographies, concept maps, learning diaries and research portfolios. [12][13][14][15] Some studies combine different methods to strengthen the evidence provided.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2000, the Oregon State University (OSU) Library's Instruction Workgroup (IWG) responded to the publication of the ACRL Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education (ACRL ILCS) by doing a self-study of current practice and teaching priorities among our instruction librarians (Davidson et al, 2002). In early 2001, the Workgroup drafted a vision statement articulating a new mission for the library's instruction program and a work plan to make it happen.…”
Section: Where We Startedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All teaching librarians were asked to complete a survey form for each subject area in which they taught, since we suspected there might be different approaches across disciplines. A more complete description of this``self-study'' process is presented in Davidson et al (2002).…”
Section: Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%